Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 München using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 395 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:05. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:32 (From 08:29 to 06:57) | 37.6% |
| Run Total | 01:04 (From 42:49 to 41:45) | 26.1% |
| Sled Push | 01:00 (From 05:02 to 04:02) | 24.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:17 (From 02:46 to 02:29) | 6.9% |
| BBJ | 00:09 (From 05:01 to 04:52) | 3.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:03 (From 05:33 to 05:30) | 1.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:16 to 04:16) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:25 to 04:25) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 06:49 to 06:49) | 0.0% |
| Von Saint Germain David | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:08 | 00:00 | 04:25 -00:17 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:16 | 04:08 | 04:27 -00:11 | 04:25 -00:17 |
| Running 2 | 05:00 | 08:24 | 04:47 +00:13 | 08:52 -00:28 |
| Sled Push | 05:02 | 13:24 | 04:11 +00:51 | 13:39 -00:15 |
| Running 3 | 05:19 | 18:26 | 05:22 -00:03 | 17:50 +00:36 |
| Sled Pull | 08:29 | 23:45 | 07:26 +01:03 | 23:12 +00:33 |
| Running 4 | 05:34 | 32:14 | 05:23 +00:11 | 30:38 +01:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:01 | 37:48 | 05:04 -00:03 | 36:01 +01:47 |
| Running 5 | 05:35 | 42:49 | 05:28 +00:07 | 41:05 +01:44 |
| Rowing | 04:25 | 48:24 | 04:43 -00:18 | 46:33 +01:51 |
| Running 6 | 05:30 | 52:49 | 05:20 +00:10 | 51:16 +01:33 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:46 | 58:19 | 02:31 +00:15 | 56:36 +01:43 |
| Running 7 | 05:28 | 01:01:05 | 05:27 +00:01 | 59:07 +01:58 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:33 | 01:06:33 | 05:42 -00:09 | 01:04:34 +01:59 |
| Running 8 | 06:17 | 01:12:06 | 06:06 +00:11 | 01:10:16 +01:50 |
| Wall Balls | 06:49 | 01:18:23 | 07:45 -00:56 | 01:16:22 +02:01 |
| Roxzone | 05:56 | 01:31:01 | 06:54 -00:58 | 01:31:01 |
David's strongest segment was the running portion, as indicated by his total running time of 00:42:49, which was 00:39 faster than the average. This suggests that he has a good running profile and should continue to focus on improving his strength for better overall performance.
For the Sled Pull, David was 02:51 slower than the average. To improve in this segment, he should incorporate more exercises that target his upper body and lower body strength, such as deadlifts, pull-ups, and squats. Additionally, practicing proper sled pulling technique and working on his speed and power during transitions will help him reduce time lost in this segment.
In the Sled Push, David was 01:38 slower than the average. To improve in this segment, he should work on his lower body strength and explosive power. Exercises like weighted sled pushes, squats, lunges, and plyometric drills will help him build the necessary strength and power for a faster push.
In the Farmers Carry, David was 00:25 slower than the average. To improve in this segment, he should focus on grip strength and overall endurance. Exercises like farmer's carries, dead hangs, and forearm curls will help him build grip strength. Additionally, incorporating cardio exercises like running or rowing with grip-intensive activities will improve his endurance in this segment.
In terms of pacing, David should aim to maintain a steady speed throughout the race, taking into consideration the demands of each segment. It is important for him to find a balance between pushing his limits and pacing himself appropriately to avoid fatigue.
To improve overall race performance, David should incorporate specific training sessions that mimic the race conditions. This could include practicing transitions between segments, focusing on speed and efficiency. Additionally, he should incorporate interval training to improve his cardiovascular endurance and work on his strength and power through resistance training exercises.
Overall, David has shown strengths in the running portions of the race and should continue to build upon this. By targeting the areas where he lost the most time, improving his overall fitness, and refining his transition techniques, he can further enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Shaw Marcus | 2024 Birmingham | 01:30:50 | |
| Davies Jack | 2023 Glasgow | 01:31:14 | |
| Gillen Matt | 2021 Dallas | 01:31:22 | |
| Ostojic Stefan | 2023 Stockholm | 01:30:37 | |
| Klein Harrison | 2021 Austin | 01:30:36 | |
| Boomhower Jeff | 2021 New York | 01:30:58 | |
| Radev Velislav | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:31:05 | |
| Grassi Stefano | 2024 Turin | 01:31:21 | |
| Leballeur Luke | 2024 London | 01:30:32 | |
| Fittock Nathan | 2024 Brisbane | 01:30:34 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Hannover Von Saint Germain David | 01:17:41 | |
| 2023 Köln Von Saint Germain David | 01:24:41 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Von Saint Germain David
