Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 München using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Eggerl Isabelle's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Eggerl Isabelle's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Eggerl Isabelle's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Eggerl Isabelle's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:54 | 45:41 to 42:47 | 53.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:22 | 06:35 to 05:13 | 25.1% |
| Rowing | 00:47 | 05:55 to 05:08 | 14.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:22 | 05:16 to 04:54 | 6.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 02:02 to 02:00 | 0.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:17 to 02:17 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:50 to 04:50 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:45 to 03:45 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:19 to 03:19 | 0.0% |
| Eggerl Isabelle | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:49 | 00:00 | 04:58 -00:09 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:16 | 04:49 | 05:01 +00:15 | 04:58 -00:09 |
| Running 2 | 05:27 | 10:05 | 05:16 +00:11 | 09:59 +00:06 |
| Sled Push | 02:17 | 15:32 | 02:36 -00:19 | 15:15 +00:17 |
| Running 3 | 05:45 | 17:49 | 05:30 +00:15 | 17:51 -00:02 |
| Sled Pull | 04:50 | 23:34 | 05:24 -00:34 | 23:21 +00:13 |
| Running 4 | 05:58 | 28:24 | 05:33 +00:25 | 28:45 -00:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:35 | 34:22 | 05:37 +00:58 | 34:18 +00:04 |
| Running 5 | 06:03 | 40:57 | 05:41 +00:22 | 39:55 +01:02 |
| Rowing | 05:55 | 47:00 | 05:16 +00:39 | 45:36 +01:24 |
| Running 6 | 05:36 | 52:55 | 05:35 +00:01 | 50:52 +02:03 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:02 | 58:31 | 02:10 -00:08 | 56:27 +02:04 |
| Running 7 | 05:48 | 01:00:33 | 05:33 +00:15 | 58:37 +01:56 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:45 | 01:06:21 | 04:28 -00:43 | 01:04:10 +02:11 |
| Running 8 | 06:18 | 01:10:06 | 05:55 +00:23 | 01:08:38 +01:28 |
| Wall Balls | 03:19 | 01:16:24 | 04:32 -01:13 | 01:14:33 +01:51 |
| Roxzone | 05:47 | 01:25:22 | 06:17 -00:30 | 01:25:22 |
Isabelle's total running time was 00:45:41, which was 02:16 slower than the average. This indicates that she could focus on improving her running speed and efficiency to enhance her performance. Her best running lap was 00:04:49, which was 00:03 slower than the average.
Isabelle should also pay attention to her transitions in the roxzone. To improve her overall race time, she should aim to minimize the time spent in the transition zones. This can be achieved through efficient movement and quick transitions between exercises.
Incorporating strength training into her routine can also benefit Isabelle's overall performance. By focusing on building strength in her lower body and core, she can improve her power, stability, and endurance in the various exercises.
It is crucial for Isabelle to maintain a well-rounded training program that includes a mix of running, strength training, and specific exercises targeting the areas of improvement identified in this analysis. Regular practice and consistent training will help her improve her overall performance and achieve better results in future HYROX races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Moeller Johanna Katharina | 2023 Hamburg | 01:25:46 | |
| Hille Vanessa | 2024 Hamburg | 01:24:52 | |
| Reilly Sarah | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:25:43 | |
| Braren Jule | 2021 Hamburg | 01:25:11 | |
| Faulkner Hope | 2024 Dublin | 01:25:48 | |
| Herbrand Mireille | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:25:32 | |
| Greeley Lindsey | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:24:54 | |
| Bibi Serena | 2024 Milan | 01:25:28 | |
| Wenning Marina | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:25:27 | |
| Brady Megan | 2024 Glasgow | 01:25:38 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
