Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mastrodicasa Ebrisa's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mastrodicasa Ebrisa's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mastrodicasa Ebrisa's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mastrodicasa Ebrisa's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:05. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:58 | 09:16 to 06:18 | 72.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:23 | 05:31 to 05:08 | 9.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:22 | 05:19 to 04:57 | 9.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:20 | 05:14 to 04:54 | 8.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:02 | 02:47 to 02:45 | 0.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:26 to 05:26 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:11 to 02:11 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 46:31 to 46:31 | 0.0% |
| Mastrodicasa Ebrisa | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:15 | 00:00 | 05:18 -00:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:31 | 05:15 | 05:12 +00:19 | 05:18 -00:03 |
| Running 2 | 05:19 | 10:46 | 05:42 -00:23 | 10:30 +00:16 |
| Sled Push | 02:47 | 16:05 | 02:51 -00:04 | 16:12 -00:07 |
| Running 3 | 05:47 | 18:52 | 06:03 -00:16 | 19:03 -00:11 |
| Sled Pull | 05:26 | 24:39 | 06:03 -00:37 | 25:06 -00:27 |
| Running 4 | 05:48 | 30:05 | 06:02 -00:14 | 31:09 -01:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:16 | 35:53 | 06:38 +02:38 | 37:11 -01:18 |
| Running 5 | 05:45 | 45:09 | 06:12 -00:27 | 43:49 +01:20 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 50:54 | 05:28 -00:24 | 50:01 +00:53 |
| Running 6 | 06:00 | 55:58 | 06:04 -00:04 | 55:29 +00:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:11 | 01:01:58 | 02:22 -00:11 | 01:01:33 +00:25 |
| Running 7 | 05:55 | 01:04:09 | 06:05 -00:10 | 01:03:55 +00:14 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:14 | 01:10:04 | 05:05 +00:09 | 01:10:00 +00:04 |
| Running 8 | 06:46 | 01:15:18 | 06:34 +00:12 | 01:15:05 +00:13 |
| Wall Balls | 05:19 | 01:22:04 | 05:23 -00:04 | 01:21:39 +00:25 |
| Roxzone | 07:12 | 01:34:26 | 07:24 -00:12 | 01:34:26 |
Ebrisa's performance was commendable, especially in the running segments. She performed better than average in Running 2, Sled Push, Running 3, Sled Pull, Running 4, Running 5, Rowing, Running 6, Farmers Carry, Running 7, and Roxzone. These segments showcased her strength and endurance as a runner.
Considering Ebrisa's profile, she appears to have a stronger running profile compared to her strength performance. To further enhance her overall performance, she should continue to prioritize running training while also incorporating strength and functional fitness exercises to improve in specific areas of weakness. With consistent training and targeted strategies, Ebrisa has the potential to achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Väth Klara | 2021 Stuttgart | 01:34:10 | |
| Herbreteau Maud | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:34:54 | |
| Dzido Isia | 2023 London | 01:34:31 | |
| Byrnes Amy | 2024 Madrid | 01:34:50 | |
| Cheung Brenda | 2024 Taipei | 01:34:01 | |
| McGhee Kimberly | 2022 Chicago | 01:34:19 | |
| Johnson Sammy | 2023 Birmingham | 01:34:49 | |
| Smith Liza | 2022 London | 01:34:45 | |
| Rilen Holly | 2024 Melbourne | 01:34:32 | |
| Hofman Evelien | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:34:42 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
