Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire De Jong Jack's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights De Jong Jack's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the De Jong Jack's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve De Jong Jack's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:32 | 44:47 to 39:15 | 85.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:36 | 05:03 to 04:27 | 9.3% |
| Rowing | 00:13 | 04:48 to 04:35 | 3.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:08 | 02:01 to 01:53 | 2.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:01 to 04:01 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:01 to 02:01 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:29 to 03:29 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:37 to 03:37 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| De Jong Jack | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:38 | 00:00 | 04:23 -00:45 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:01 | 03:38 | 04:21 -00:20 | 04:23 -00:45 |
| Running 2 | 05:08 | 07:39 | 04:43 +00:25 | 08:44 -01:05 |
| Sled Push | 02:01 | 12:47 | 02:44 -00:43 | 13:27 -00:40 |
| Running 3 | 05:23 | 14:48 | 05:06 +00:17 | 16:11 -01:23 |
| Sled Pull | 03:29 | 20:11 | 04:34 -01:05 | 21:17 -01:06 |
| Running 4 | 05:58 | 23:40 | 05:05 +00:53 | 25:51 -02:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:03 | 29:38 | 04:52 +00:11 | 30:56 -01:18 |
| Running 5 | 06:21 | 34:41 | 05:14 +01:07 | 35:48 -01:07 |
| Rowing | 04:48 | 41:02 | 04:40 +00:08 | 41:02 +00:00 |
| Running 6 | 05:55 | 45:50 | 05:07 +00:48 | 45:42 +00:08 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:01 | 51:45 | 02:03 -00:02 | 50:49 +00:56 |
| Running 7 | 05:45 | 53:46 | 05:05 +00:40 | 52:52 +00:54 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:37 | 59:31 | 04:43 -01:06 | 57:57 +01:34 |
| Running 8 | 06:42 | 01:03:08 | 05:34 +01:08 | 01:02:40 +00:28 |
| Wall Balls | 04:40 | 01:09:50 | 05:56 -01:16 | 01:08:14 +01:36 |
| Roxzone | 05:56 | 01:20:18 | 06:08 -00:12 | 01:20:18 |
Jack De Jong delivered a solid performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, ranking 723rd overall and 190th in his age group, placing him within the top 23% and 28%, respectively. His overall time of 01:20:18 showcases a commendable effort, especially in technical challenges like the Sled Push and Sandbag Lunges, where he excelled significantly. However, Jack's total running time of 44:47 was 04:04 slower than average, indicating room for improvement in his running efficiency. Notably, Jack's initial running pace was brisk, evident from his faster-than-average Running 1 split, but his pace declined dramatically in subsequent runs, suggesting a need for better pacing strategy. Overall, Jack appears to have a strong hybrid profile, showing strength in several exercise zones but needing improvement in running endurance and pacing.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Baumgärtner Timo | 2022 Hamburg | 01:20:11 | |
| Faul Brian | 2024 Madrid | 01:19:55 | |
| Schött Dominik | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:20:22 | |
| Stainer Tom | 2023 London | 01:20:44 | |
| Hartley David | 2022 London | 01:20:42 | |
| Weber Sebastian | 2023 Wien | 01:20:28 | |
| Boden Matthew | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:19:57 | |
| Hindriks Leon | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:20:30 | |
| Wheadon Jason | 2024 Singapore | 01:19:52 | |
| Trevallion Alex | 2024 Melbourne | 01:20:01 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
