Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Waters Amy's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Waters Amy's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Waters Amy's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Waters Amy's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:16. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:33 | 07:03 to 04:30 | 48.4% |
| Run Total | 02:15 | 46:53 to 44:38 | 42.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:21 | 02:52 to 02:31 | 6.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:07 | 02:13 to 02:06 | 2.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:15 to 05:15 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:59 to 03:59 | 0.0% |
| Waters Amy | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:14 | 00:00 | 05:08 +00:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:34 | 05:14 | 05:06 -00:32 | 05:08 +00:06 |
| Running 2 | 05:43 | 09:48 | 05:26 +00:17 | 10:14 -00:26 |
| Sled Push | 02:52 | 15:31 | 02:43 +00:09 | 15:40 -00:09 |
| Running 3 | 05:56 | 18:23 | 05:44 +00:12 | 18:23 +00:00 |
| Sled Pull | 04:27 | 24:19 | 05:40 -01:13 | 24:07 +00:12 |
| Running 4 | 06:09 | 28:46 | 05:45 +00:24 | 29:47 -01:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:15 | 34:55 | 05:58 -00:43 | 35:32 -00:37 |
| Running 5 | 06:04 | 40:10 | 05:53 +00:11 | 41:30 -01:20 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 46:14 | 05:20 -00:16 | 47:23 -01:09 |
| Running 6 | 05:44 | 51:18 | 05:48 -00:04 | 52:43 -01:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:13 | 57:02 | 02:15 -00:02 | 58:31 -01:29 |
| Running 7 | 05:52 | 59:15 | 05:45 +00:07 | 01:00:46 -01:31 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:03 | 01:05:07 | 04:41 +02:22 | 01:06:31 -01:24 |
| Running 8 | 06:16 | 01:12:10 | 06:08 +00:08 | 01:11:12 +00:58 |
| Wall Balls | 03:59 | 01:18:26 | 04:51 -00:52 | 01:17:20 +01:06 |
| Roxzone | 06:39 | 01:28:54 | 06:43 -00:04 | 01:28:54 |
Amy's total running time of 00:46:53 was 02:31 slower than the average for her finish time. This indicates that she may have lost some time during the running segments and could benefit from improving her overall fitness and transition time.
The best running lap for Amy was 00:05:14, which was 00:20 slower than the average. While this is still a solid performance, there is room for improvement in terms of her speed and efficiency during the running segments.
In conclusion, Amy Waters had a strong performance in the 2021 London Hyrox race. To further enhance her performance, she should focus on improving her overall running fitness, particularly in the segments where she lost the most time. Incorporating specific training strategies, exercises, and drills tailored to address these areas of improvement will help her continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Curran Deirbhile | 2024 Manchester | 01:28:42 | |
| Officer Lesley | 2023 Glasgow | 01:28:26 | |
| Dancau Ana | 2023 Hamburg | 01:29:06 | |
| Gerber Léonie | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:28:29 | |
| Muphy Steph | 2023 London | 01:28:57 | |
| Michaelis Maxine | 2022 Bremen | 01:28:25 | |
| Davies Jil | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:28:57 | |
| Meurer Anne | 2024 Berlin | 01:28:24 | |
| Milne Kirstin | 2022 London | 01:28:45 | |
| Young Hayley | 2022 London | 01:29:19 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 London | 01:42:07 | |
| 2022 Manchester | 01:24:39 | |
| 2022 London | 01:24:08 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
