Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Stuttgart using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 90 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Schmitt Andy's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Schmitt Andy's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Schmitt Andy's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Schmitt Andy's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 15:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 08:23 | 01:08:02 to 59:39 | 55.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:46 | 11:12 to 08:26 | 18.2% |
| Sled Pull | 02:01 | 09:53 to 07:52 | 13.3% |
| Wall Balls | 01:40 | 12:57 to 11:17 | 11.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:10 | 05:17 to 05:07 | 1.1% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 05:50 to 05:43 | 0.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:03 | 09:10 to 09:07 | 0.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:19 to 02:19 | 0.0% |
| Schmitt Andy | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:14 | 00:00 | 06:22 -00:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:17 | 06:14 | 05:15 +00:02 | 06:22 -00:08 |
| Running 2 | 06:59 | 11:31 | 07:09 -00:10 | 11:37 -00:06 |
| Sled Push | 04:29 | 18:30 | 05:12 -00:43 | 18:46 -00:16 |
| Running 3 | 07:17 | 22:59 | 08:17 -01:00 | 23:58 -00:59 |
| Sled Pull | 09:53 | 30:16 | 08:40 +01:13 | 32:15 -01:59 |
| Running 4 | 07:21 | 40:09 | 08:23 -01:02 | 40:55 -00:46 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:10 | 47:30 | 09:52 -00:42 | 49:18 -01:48 |
| Running 5 | 08:11 | 56:40 | 08:56 -00:45 | 59:10 -02:30 |
| Rowing | 05:50 | 01:04:51 | 05:53 -00:03 | 01:08:06 -03:15 |
| Running 6 | 08:09 | 01:10:41 | 08:26 -00:17 | 01:13:59 -03:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:19 | 01:18:50 | 03:23 -01:04 | 01:22:25 -03:35 |
| Running 7 | 12:24 | 01:21:09 | 08:27 +03:57 | 01:25:48 -04:39 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 11:12 | 01:33:33 | 09:57 +01:15 | 01:34:15 -00:42 |
| Running 8 | 11:31 | 01:44:45 | 11:45 -00:14 | 01:44:12 +00:33 |
| Wall Balls | 12:57 | 01:56:16 | 12:55 +00:02 | 01:55:57 +00:19 |
| Roxzone | 13:07 | 02:22:10 | 13:18 -00:11 | 02:22:10 |
Andy Schmitt's performance in the 2024 Stuttgart Hyrox race demonstrates a strong inclination towards endurance running, with a commendable proficiency in managing the running segments. Despite this, his overall rank placed him in the top 67% of all athletes, and 82% in his age group, indicating room for improvement to become more competitive. Notably, Andy's total running time was 15 seconds slower than average, suggesting that running might not be his strongest suit, which indicates a potential hybrid profile. His earlier running segments were significantly faster than average, indicating a fast start which might have contributed to the slower total running time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Shirodkar Santosh | 2024 Copenhagen | 02:22:02 | |
| Hittenberger Patrick | 2022 Wien | 02:22:22 | |
| Klein Obbink Patrick | 2023 Rotterdam | 02:21:53 | |
| Schmitt Andy | 2024 Stuttgart | 02:22:10 | |
| Shaw Kevin | 2021 Dallas | 02:22:14 | |
| Velrasu Prasanna | 2024 London | 02:22:10 | |
| Zurlo Damiano | 2024 Milan | 02:22:07 | |
| Ismail Md Zaki | 2024 Singapore | 02:22:27 | |
| Kirkbride James | 2023 Manchester | 02:22:32 | |
| Klute Nikolai | 2019 Hamburg | 02:21:40 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
