Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 157 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Peatling James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Peatling James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Peatling James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Peatling James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 18:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:32 | 01:03:53 to 57:21 | 36.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:19 | 14:16 to 07:57 | 34.8% |
| Wall Balls | 03:20 | 13:55 to 10:35 | 18.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:59 | 10:37 to 08:38 | 10.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:06 to 02:06 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:23 to 05:23 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:21 to 05:21 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:16 to 02:16 | 0.0% |
| Peatling James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:59 | 00:00 | 06:04 -00:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:39 | 05:59 | 05:03 -00:24 | 06:04 -00:05 |
| Running 2 | 06:43 | 10:38 | 06:51 -00:08 | 11:07 -00:29 |
| Sled Push | 02:06 | 17:21 | 04:13 -02:07 | 17:58 -00:37 |
| Running 3 | 07:25 | 19:27 | 07:55 -00:30 | 22:11 -02:44 |
| Sled Pull | 05:23 | 26:52 | 07:53 -02:30 | 30:06 -03:14 |
| Running 4 | 08:11 | 32:15 | 07:53 +00:18 | 37:59 -05:44 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:37 | 40:26 | 09:36 +01:01 | 45:52 -05:26 |
| Running 5 | 09:00 | 51:03 | 08:31 +00:29 | 55:28 -04:25 |
| Rowing | 05:21 | 01:00:03 | 05:56 -00:35 | 01:03:59 -03:56 |
| Running 6 | 08:56 | 01:05:24 | 08:17 +00:39 | 01:09:55 -04:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:16 | 01:14:20 | 03:13 -00:57 | 01:18:12 -03:52 |
| Running 7 | 08:19 | 01:16:36 | 08:10 +00:09 | 01:21:25 -04:49 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 14:16 | 01:24:55 | 09:16 +05:00 | 01:29:35 -04:40 |
| Running 8 | 09:24 | 01:39:11 | 11:07 -01:43 | 01:38:51 +00:20 |
| Wall Balls | 13:55 | 01:48:35 | 11:09 +02:46 | 01:49:58 -01:23 |
| Roxzone | 10:41 | 02:13:03 | 11:56 -01:15 | 02:13:03 |
James Peatling delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, ranking within the top 62% both overall and in his age group. His total running time was notably faster than average, indicating a strength in running. However, his performance in strength-based exercises, particularly the Sandbag Lunges and Wall Balls, suggests a need for further development in this area. James's pacing strategy shows he started conservatively in the early running segments and improved over time, which indicates a well-managed energy distribution. His transition times in the Roxzone were efficient, showing good overall fitness and a focus on maintaining momentum.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Esquivel Toni | 2023 Valencia | 02:12:46 | |
| Chapman David | 2021 Dallas | 02:12:44 | |
| Cardozo Jesus | 2022 Chicago | 02:12:43 | |
| Spurlock James | 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 02:13:19 | |
| Ward Julian | 2022 Manchester | 02:13:21 | |
| Felzmann Mario | 2023 München | 02:13:01 | |
| Sheldon Rees | 2023 Birmingham | 02:13:00 | |
| Lechner Florian | 2023 München | 02:13:03 | |
| Bücker Marius | 2019 Essen | 02:12:49 | |
| Göthe Robert | 2024 Stockholm | 02:12:40 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
