Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcneill James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcneill James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcneill James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcneill James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 09:27 | 53:10 to 43:43 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:01 to 02:01 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:17 to 03:17 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:18 to 05:18 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:54 to 01:54 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:00 to 06:00 | 0.0% |
| Mcneill James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:21 | 00:00 | 04:46 +01:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:10 | 06:21 | 04:31 -00:21 | 04:46 +01:35 |
| Running 2 | 06:04 | 10:31 | 05:08 +00:56 | 09:17 +01:14 |
| Sled Push | 02:01 | 16:35 | 03:04 -01:03 | 14:25 +02:10 |
| Running 3 | 06:31 | 18:36 | 05:37 +00:54 | 17:29 +01:07 |
| Sled Pull | 03:17 | 25:07 | 05:13 -01:56 | 23:06 +02:01 |
| Running 4 | 06:44 | 28:24 | 05:36 +01:08 | 28:19 +00:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:18 | 35:08 | 05:44 -00:26 | 33:55 +01:13 |
| Running 5 | 06:43 | 40:26 | 05:47 +00:56 | 39:39 +00:47 |
| Rowing | 04:12 | 47:09 | 04:55 -00:43 | 45:26 +01:43 |
| Running 6 | 06:51 | 51:21 | 05:37 +01:14 | 50:21 +01:00 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:54 | 58:12 | 02:18 -00:24 | 55:58 +02:14 |
| Running 7 | 05:29 | 01:00:06 | 05:36 -00:07 | 58:16 +01:50 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:28 | 01:05:35 | 05:28 -01:00 | 01:03:52 +01:43 |
| Running 8 | 08:32 | 01:10:03 | 06:17 +02:15 | 01:09:20 +00:43 |
| Wall Balls | 06:00 | 01:18:35 | 06:57 -00:57 | 01:15:37 +02:58 |
| Roxzone | 05:33 | 01:30:00 | 07:26 -01:53 | 01:30:00 |
In terms of pacing, James should focus on maintaining a consistent pace throughout the race. Some of his splits were significantly slower than average, indicating that he may have started too fast or struggled to maintain momentum.
Based on his overall time, James has a balanced profile with a slight inclination towards strength exercises. However, his total running time was 10:06 slower than average, suggesting that he can benefit from more focused running training to improve his overall fitness and running performance.
Overall, James Mcneill had a solid performance in the Hyrox race in Melbourne. By focusing on improving his running performance, refining his pacing strategy, and implementing specific training strategies for his identified areas of improvement, he can enhance his performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| D'Onofrio Luca Mario | 2024 Milan | 01:29:48 | |
| Hennelly Liam | 2024 Dublin | 01:30:12 | |
| Menzies Darren | 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:58 | |
| Téllez Oscar | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:30:24 | |
| Fink Florian | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:30:18 | |
| Kal Pieter | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:29:56 | |
| Prehl Daniel | 2024 Gdansk | 01:29:36 | |
| Meyer Marco | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:30:26 | |
| Le Balch Sébastien | 2024 Paris | 01:30:00 | |
| Weismann Noë | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:30:18 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
