Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Frankfurt using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kula Diana's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kula Diana's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kula Diana's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kula Diana's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:56. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:11 | 50:01 to 47:50 | 44.3% |
| Sled Pull | 01:19 | 07:13 to 05:54 | 26.7% |
| Rowing | 00:50 | 06:17 to 05:27 | 16.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:29 | 03:18 to 02:49 | 9.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 05:18 to 05:11 | 2.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:12 to 02:12 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Kula Diana | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:14 | 00:00 | 05:26 -00:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:18 | 05:14 | 05:14 +00:04 | 05:26 -00:12 |
| Running 2 | 05:52 | 10:32 | 05:46 +00:06 | 10:40 -00:08 |
| Sled Push | 03:18 | 16:24 | 02:56 +00:22 | 16:26 -00:02 |
| Running 3 | 06:20 | 19:42 | 06:05 +00:15 | 19:22 +00:20 |
| Sled Pull | 07:13 | 26:02 | 06:14 +00:59 | 25:27 +00:35 |
| Running 4 | 06:07 | 33:15 | 06:06 +00:01 | 31:41 +01:34 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:36 | 39:22 | 06:54 -02:18 | 37:47 +01:35 |
| Running 5 | 07:07 | 43:58 | 06:16 +00:51 | 44:41 -00:43 |
| Rowing | 06:17 | 51:05 | 05:31 +00:46 | 50:57 +00:08 |
| Running 6 | 06:04 | 57:22 | 06:10 -00:06 | 56:28 +00:54 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:12 | 01:03:26 | 02:25 -00:13 | 01:02:38 +00:48 |
| Running 7 | 06:10 | 01:05:38 | 06:09 +00:01 | 01:05:03 +00:35 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:31 | 01:11:48 | 05:15 -00:44 | 01:11:12 +00:36 |
| Running 8 | 07:12 | 01:16:19 | 06:41 +00:31 | 01:16:27 -00:08 |
| Wall Balls | 04:59 | 01:23:31 | 05:31 -00:32 | 01:23:08 +00:23 |
| Roxzone | 07:55 | 01:36:15 | 07:36 +00:19 | 01:36:15 |
One area of improvement for Diana is her total running time, which was 00:50:01, 02:33 slower than the average. This indicates that she may need to focus on improving her running ability and endurance. However, it is important to note that her best running lap was 00:05:14, which was equal to the average time. This suggests that her running performance was inconsistent throughout the race.
By implementing these training strategies and race strategies, Diana can improve her overall performance in future Hyrox races and continue to excel in her age group.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ettinger Anita | 2024 Maastricht | 01:35:53 | |
| Bradaia Mélanie | 2024 Paris | 01:35:49 | |
| Zappala Maddy | 2024 Sydney | 01:36:36 | |
| Mcateer Cheryl | 2021 Birmingham | 01:36:31 | |
| Witek Marta | 2024 Gdansk | 01:36:19 | |
| Erlandsen Camilla | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:36:34 | |
| Fitzpatrick Audrey | 2024 Dublin | 01:35:53 | |
| Schindler Corina | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:36:38 | |
| Diey Danielle | 2023 Birmingham | 01:35:54 | |
| Banks Emma | 2024 Paris | 01:36:09 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:35:48 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
