Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Forster Nick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Forster Nick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Forster Nick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Forster Nick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:40. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:20 | 40:07 to 36:47 | 50.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:24 | 06:20 to 03:56 | 36.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:22 | 04:21 to 03:59 | 5.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:17 | 04:26 to 04:09 | 4.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:10 | 01:53 to 01:43 | 2.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:07 | 05:02 to 04:55 | 1.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:46 to 01:46 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:12 to 03:12 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Forster Nick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:39 | 00:00 | 04:13 +00:26 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:26 | 04:39 | 04:17 +00:09 | 04:13 +00:26 |
| Running 2 | 04:36 | 09:05 | 04:29 +00:07 | 08:30 +00:35 |
| Sled Push | 01:46 | 13:41 | 02:35 -00:49 | 12:59 +00:42 |
| Running 3 | 05:05 | 15:27 | 04:52 +00:13 | 15:34 -00:07 |
| Sled Pull | 03:12 | 20:32 | 04:16 -01:04 | 20:26 +00:06 |
| Running 4 | 05:17 | 23:44 | 04:49 +00:28 | 24:42 -00:58 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:20 | 29:01 | 04:25 +01:55 | 29:31 -00:30 |
| Running 5 | 04:52 | 35:21 | 04:57 -00:05 | 33:56 +01:25 |
| Rowing | 04:25 | 40:13 | 04:34 -00:09 | 38:53 +01:20 |
| Running 6 | 04:52 | 44:38 | 04:51 +00:01 | 43:27 +01:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:53 | 49:30 | 01:56 -00:03 | 48:18 +01:12 |
| Running 7 | 04:49 | 51:23 | 04:50 -00:01 | 50:14 +01:09 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:21 | 56:12 | 04:23 -00:02 | 55:04 +01:08 |
| Running 8 | 06:01 | 01:00:33 | 05:13 +00:48 | 59:27 +01:06 |
| Wall Balls | 05:02 | 01:06:34 | 05:29 -00:27 | 01:04:40 +01:54 |
| Roxzone | 04:17 | 01:15:44 | 05:35 -01:18 | 01:15:44 |
Based on his results, it is evident that Nick has a balanced profile, with no significant advantage in either running or strength-based challenges. However, his total running time of 40:07 was 2 minutes and 50 seconds slower than the average time, indicating that he could benefit from improving his running abilities. It is recommended that Nick focuses on increasing his running speed and endurance to enhance his overall performance.
In conclusion, while Nick Forster had a strong performance in the HYROX race, there are specific areas that can be improved to enhance his overall performance. By focusing on improving his running abilities, implementing targeted training strategies, and optimizing race strategies, Nick can continue to excel and achieve even better results in future competitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gray Andy | 2023 Köln | 01:16:04 | |
| Lawrie Mark | 2023 Glasgow | 01:15:48 | |
| Stratton Jimmy | 2022 New York | 01:15:41 | |
| Osseiran Nael | 2019 New York | 01:16:02 | |
| Van De Watering Bert | 2024 Maastricht | 01:15:52 | |
| Greswold Charlie | 2024 Manchester | 01:15:38 | |
| Fitzsimons Sean | 2024 Manchester | 01:15:38 | |
| Thompson Chris | 2022 Dallas | 01:15:47 | |
| Budemann Tim | 2024 Hamburg | 01:15:47 | |
| Hardman Martin | 2024 Glasgow | 01:15:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
