Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Chantre Paulo's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Chantre Paulo's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Chantre Paulo's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Chantre Paulo's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:22. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:17 | 09:02 to 06:45 | 42.5% |
| Run Total | 01:18 | 45:35 to 44:17 | 24.2% |
| Sled Pull | 01:01 | 06:07 to 05:06 | 18.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:31 | 05:01 to 04:30 | 9.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:12 | 05:49 to 05:37 | 3.7% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:56 to 04:53 | 0.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:59 to 02:59 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Chantre Paulo | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:13 | 00:00 | 04:46 +00:27 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:01 | 05:13 | 04:33 +00:28 | 04:46 +00:27 |
| Running 2 | 04:58 | 10:14 | 05:14 -00:16 | 09:19 +00:55 |
| Sled Push | 02:59 | 15:12 | 03:07 -00:08 | 14:33 +00:39 |
| Running 3 | 05:59 | 18:11 | 05:45 +00:14 | 17:40 +00:31 |
| Sled Pull | 06:07 | 24:10 | 05:20 +00:47 | 23:25 +00:45 |
| Running 4 | 05:47 | 30:17 | 05:43 +00:04 | 28:45 +01:32 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:49 | 36:04 | 05:56 -00:07 | 34:28 +01:36 |
| Running 5 | 06:01 | 41:53 | 05:54 +00:07 | 40:24 +01:29 |
| Rowing | 04:56 | 47:54 | 04:57 -00:01 | 46:18 +01:36 |
| Running 6 | 05:49 | 52:50 | 05:44 +00:05 | 51:15 +01:35 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 58:39 | 02:20 -00:22 | 56:59 +01:40 |
| Running 7 | 05:35 | 01:00:37 | 05:43 -00:08 | 59:19 +01:18 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:38 | 01:06:12 | 05:33 -00:55 | 01:05:02 +01:10 |
| Running 8 | 06:16 | 01:10:50 | 06:28 -00:12 | 01:10:35 +00:15 |
| Wall Balls | 09:02 | 01:17:06 | 07:10 +01:52 | 01:17:03 +00:03 |
| Roxzone | 05:48 | 01:31:48 | 07:35 -01:47 | 01:31:48 |
Paulo Chantre demonstrated a commendable performance at the 2024 Manchester HYROX event, ranking in the top 76% of 1203 athletes. However, when compared to his age group (30-34), there's room for improvement as he found himself in the top 81% of 283 athletes. Notably, Paulo's total running time was slightly slower than average, suggesting a need for focused training in this area. His best running lap, however, was competitive with an impressive time of 00:04:58. His performance in the Roxzone was outstanding, being 01:45 faster than average, suggesting strong overall fitness and effective transition times.
Throughout the race, it is crucial to maintain a steady pace, particularly in the initial running segments. Starting too fast can lead to premature fatigue and slower times in later segments. Paulo should also focus on efficient transitions between segments to conserve energy and time. Finally, in strength-oriented tasks like the Sled Pull and Wall Balls, focusing on maintaining good form throughout can help prevent fatigue and injury, leading to stronger performance overall.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mcdermott Jacob | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:32:09 | |
| Crabtree Mark | 2023 Birmingham | 01:31:42 | |
| Veit Mario | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:31:54 | |
| Santana Barroso Miguel | 2023 Rimini | 01:32:17 | |
| Moran John | 2024 Dublin | 01:32:04 | |
| Näslund Björn | 2024 Stockholm | 01:31:40 | |
| Opitz Sebastian | 2023 Barcelona | 01:31:55 | |
| Hilleke Philipp | 2023 Hamburg | 01:31:37 | |
| Kochbati Radhouen | 2023 Barcelona | 01:32:10 | |
| Edwards Dave | 2024 Brisbane | 01:32:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 London | 01:45:23 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:25:38 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
