Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Wilding Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Wilding Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Wilding Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Wilding Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:29 | 40:33 to 39:04 | 31.9% |
| Wall Balls | 01:12 | 06:37 to 05:25 | 25.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:46 | 03:12 to 02:26 | 16.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:38 | 04:50 to 04:12 | 13.6% |
| Rowing | 00:15 | 04:50 to 04:35 | 5.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 04:27 to 04:15 | 4.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:07 | 01:59 to 01:52 | 2.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:15 to 03:15 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Wilding Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:08 | 00:00 | 04:21 -00:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:27 | 04:08 | 04:21 +00:06 | 04:21 -00:13 |
| Running 2 | 04:50 | 08:35 | 04:43 +00:07 | 08:42 -00:07 |
| Sled Push | 03:12 | 13:25 | 02:43 +00:29 | 13:25 +00:00 |
| Running 3 | 05:28 | 16:37 | 05:05 +00:23 | 16:08 +00:29 |
| Sled Pull | 04:50 | 22:05 | 04:32 +00:18 | 21:13 +00:52 |
| Running 4 | 05:07 | 26:55 | 05:05 +00:02 | 25:45 +01:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:15 | 32:02 | 04:48 -01:33 | 30:50 +01:12 |
| Running 5 | 05:11 | 35:17 | 05:13 -00:02 | 35:38 -00:21 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 40:28 | 04:40 +00:10 | 40:51 -00:23 |
| Running 6 | 05:12 | 45:18 | 05:06 +00:06 | 45:31 -00:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:59 | 50:30 | 02:02 -00:03 | 50:37 -00:07 |
| Running 7 | 05:12 | 52:29 | 05:04 +00:08 | 52:39 -00:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:14 | 57:41 | 04:40 -00:26 | 57:43 -00:02 |
| Running 8 | 05:29 | 01:01:55 | 05:33 -00:04 | 01:02:23 -00:28 |
| Wall Balls | 06:37 | 01:07:24 | 05:54 +00:43 | 01:07:56 -00:32 |
| Roxzone | 06:04 | 01:19:56 | 06:06 -00:02 | 01:19:56 |
His total running time was 00:40:33, which was 01:45 slower than the average. This indicates that he could improve his running performance. However, his best running lap was 00:04:08, which was 00:06 faster than the average. This suggests that he has the potential to excel in running and should focus on improving his overall running time.
In conclusion, Mark Wilding performed well in the 2022 Manchester Hyrox race. He demonstrated strengths in certain segments, such as running 1 and burpees broad jump, but there is room for improvement in areas such as wall balls, running 3, and rowing. By implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, he can enhance his overall performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wever Lars | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:20:09 | |
| Kopp Frederik | 2024 Hamburg | 01:20:19 | |
| Knight Dan | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:19:34 | |
| Murray Hugh | 2022 New York | 01:19:27 | |
| Bowers Reece | 2023 Milan | 01:19:26 | |
| Burn Carl | 2023 Birmingham | 01:19:44 | |
| Romanowski Patryk | 2024 Gdansk | 01:19:40 | |
| Irvine Martyn | 2024 Madrid | 01:19:31 | |
| Gilmour Scott | 2024 Birmingham | 01:19:51 | |
| Flint Nathan | 2024 Manchester | 01:20:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:22:02 | |
| 2023 Manchester | 01:27:10 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:22:49 | |
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:11:09 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:26:16 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
