Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Anaheim using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Duffy James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Duffy James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Duffy James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Duffy James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:34. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:58 | 47:27 to 42:29 | 89.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:22 | 03:10 to 02:48 | 6.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:08 | 05:07 to 04:59 | 2.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 02:12 to 02:06 | 1.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:53 to 03:53 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Duffy James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:21 | 00:00 | 04:41 +00:40 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:11 | 05:21 | 04:29 -00:18 | 04:41 +00:40 |
| Running 2 | 05:30 | 09:32 | 05:03 +00:27 | 09:10 +00:22 |
| Sled Push | 03:10 | 15:02 | 02:59 +00:11 | 14:13 +00:49 |
| Running 3 | 05:44 | 18:12 | 05:30 +00:14 | 17:12 +01:00 |
| Sled Pull | 03:53 | 23:56 | 05:04 -01:11 | 22:42 +01:14 |
| Running 4 | 06:14 | 27:49 | 05:29 +00:45 | 27:46 +00:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:47 | 34:03 | 05:31 -00:44 | 33:15 +00:48 |
| Running 5 | 06:09 | 38:50 | 05:40 +00:29 | 38:46 +00:04 |
| Rowing | 04:31 | 44:59 | 04:52 -00:21 | 44:26 +00:33 |
| Running 6 | 05:56 | 49:30 | 05:31 +00:25 | 49:18 +00:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:12 | 55:26 | 02:13 -00:01 | 54:49 +00:37 |
| Running 7 | 06:00 | 57:38 | 05:30 +00:30 | 57:02 +00:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:07 | 01:03:38 | 05:16 -00:09 | 01:02:32 +01:06 |
| Running 8 | 06:37 | 01:08:45 | 06:08 +00:29 | 01:07:48 +00:57 |
| Wall Balls | 04:54 | 01:15:22 | 06:44 -01:50 | 01:13:56 +01:26 |
| Roxzone | 07:34 | 01:27:42 | 07:02 +00:32 | 01:27:42 |
Overall, James demonstrated strong athletic abilities, especially in the Ski Erg and Sled Push segments, where he performed faster than the average. However, there are areas where improvements can be made, particularly in the running segments (Running 1, Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, and Running 8), as well as the Roxzone segment.
In conclusion, James Duffy had a strong performance in the Hyrox race but has areas for improvement, particularly in his running segments and transition efficiency. By implementing specific training strategies and techniques, focusing on his running technique, and optimizing his transitions, James can enhance his overall performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Carne Luke | 2024 Perth | 01:27:59 | |
| Schellhammer Lorenz | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:27:12 | |
| Howard Jonathan | 2024 London | 01:27:33 | |
| Van Den Oudenrijn Stewy | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:27:21 | |
| Di Somma Fabien | 2024 Marseille | 01:27:51 | |
| Schneider Christof | 2022 Essen | 01:27:38 | |
| Shortall Roy | 2023 London | 01:27:52 | |
| Leiter Derek | 2022 Chicago | 01:27:56 | |
| Burberry Terry | 2024 London | 01:27:22 | |
| Lynch Ross | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:28:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Los Angeles | 01:32:33 | |
| 2023 Los Angeles | 01:27:37 | |
| 2024 Anaheim | 01:35:25 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
