Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Los Angeles using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire De Casas David's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights De Casas David's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the De Casas David's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve De Casas David's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 08:58 | 51:59 to 43:01 | 91.5% |
| Rowing | 00:42 | 05:31 to 04:49 | 7.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:35 to 04:27 | 1.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 02:10 to 02:10 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:45 to 03:45 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:08 to 02:08 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:46 to 03:46 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:38 to 05:38 | 0.0% |
| De Casas David | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 10:23 | 00:00 | 04:43 +05:40 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:35 | 10:23 | 04:29 +00:06 | 04:43 +05:40 |
| Running 2 | 04:35 | 14:58 | 05:06 -00:31 | 09:12 +05:46 |
| Sled Push | 02:15 | 19:33 | 03:00 -00:45 | 14:18 +05:15 |
| Running 3 | 06:10 | 21:48 | 05:33 +00:37 | 17:18 +04:30 |
| Sled Pull | 02:10 | 27:58 | 05:06 -02:56 | 22:51 +05:07 |
| Running 4 | 05:40 | 30:08 | 05:32 +00:08 | 27:57 +02:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:45 | 35:48 | 05:37 -01:52 | 33:29 +02:19 |
| Running 5 | 06:05 | 39:33 | 05:43 +00:22 | 39:06 +00:27 |
| Rowing | 05:31 | 45:38 | 04:52 +00:39 | 44:49 +00:49 |
| Running 6 | 05:15 | 51:09 | 05:34 -00:19 | 49:41 +01:28 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 56:24 | 02:15 -00:07 | 55:15 +01:09 |
| Running 7 | 05:17 | 58:32 | 05:33 -00:16 | 57:30 +01:02 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:46 | 01:03:49 | 05:21 -01:35 | 01:03:03 +00:46 |
| Running 8 | 08:39 | 01:07:35 | 06:13 +02:26 | 01:08:24 -00:49 |
| Wall Balls | 05:38 | 01:16:14 | 06:48 -01:10 | 01:14:37 +01:37 |
| Roxzone | 06:54 | 01:28:36 | 07:11 -00:17 | 01:28:36 |
Based on the splits analysis, it is evident that David struggled with his running in several segments, particularly Running 1, Running 3, and Running 5. These segments were slower than average, indicating that he may need to focus more on his running training. However, his Running 2 and Running 6 segments were faster than average, suggesting that he has some strengths in this area.
In conclusion, David De Casas had a strong performance in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can make improvements to enhance his performance. Specifically, he should focus on improving his running performance in segments such as Running 1, Running 3, and Running 5. Incorporating specific training strategies, exercises, and drills tailored to address these areas will help him become a more well-rounded athlete. Additionally, implementing pacing strategies and focusing on minimizing transition time will contribute to improved overall performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| O Reilly Patrick | 2024 Dublin | 01:28:08 | |
| Viklinder Daniel | 2024 Stockholm | 01:28:19 | |
| Kruijer Ad | 2024 Sydney | 01:28:13 | |
| Seiler Sven | 2022 Hamburg | 01:28:33 | |
| Van Steeg Bart | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:28:54 | |
| Lamy François | 2024 Paris | 01:28:51 | |
| Oehri Christopher | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:28:12 | |
| Patel Paras | 2024 London | 01:28:40 | |
| Graham Gavin | 2023 Birmingham | 01:28:42 | |
| Kodjayan Luis | 2024 Hamburg | 01:28:12 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
