Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 München using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Zinke Eric's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Zinke Eric's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Zinke Eric's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Zinke Eric's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:15. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:50 | 48:50 to 47:00 | 56.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:50 | 04:07 to 03:17 | 25.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:33 | 06:09 to 05:36 | 16.9% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 05:04 to 05:03 | 0.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:01 | 07:33 to 07:32 | 0.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:10 to 06:10 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:09 to 02:09 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:18 to 05:18 | 0.0% |
| Zinke Eric | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:51 | 00:00 | 05:04 -00:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:38 | 04:51 | 04:38 +00:00 | 05:04 -00:13 |
| Running 2 | 05:43 | 09:29 | 05:30 +00:13 | 09:42 -00:13 |
| Sled Push | 04:07 | 15:12 | 03:17 +00:50 | 15:12 +00:00 |
| Running 3 | 06:12 | 19:19 | 06:03 +00:09 | 18:29 +00:50 |
| Sled Pull | 06:09 | 25:31 | 05:45 +00:24 | 24:32 +00:59 |
| Running 4 | 06:16 | 31:40 | 06:02 +00:14 | 30:17 +01:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:10 | 37:56 | 06:31 -00:21 | 36:19 +01:37 |
| Running 5 | 06:16 | 44:06 | 06:16 +00:00 | 42:50 +01:16 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 50:22 | 05:06 -00:02 | 49:06 +01:16 |
| Running 6 | 06:03 | 55:26 | 06:05 -00:02 | 54:12 +01:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 01:01:29 | 02:29 -00:20 | 01:00:17 +01:12 |
| Running 7 | 06:13 | 01:03:38 | 06:04 +00:09 | 01:02:46 +00:52 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:18 | 01:09:51 | 06:06 -00:48 | 01:08:50 +01:01 |
| Running 8 | 07:19 | 01:15:09 | 07:03 +00:16 | 01:14:56 +00:13 |
| Wall Balls | 07:33 | 01:22:28 | 07:50 -00:17 | 01:21:59 +00:29 |
| Roxzone | 08:23 | 01:38:17 | 08:28 -00:05 | 01:38:17 |
Based on the splits analysis, Eric's running performance was slightly slower than average, with running segments 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7 being the areas where he lost the most time. His pacing throughout the race was consistent, although slightly slower than average. He has a balanced profile, with no significant preference for either running or strength-based exercises.
In conclusion, Eric Zinke performed well in the HYROX race in Munich, with areas of strength in his overall rank and balanced performance in both running and strength-based exercises. To improve his performance, Eric should focus on increasing his running speed and endurance, as well as working on his sled push technique and lower body strength. Implementing race strategies such as pacing, efficient transitions, and mental preparation will also contribute to his overall performance improvement.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cavani Stefano | 2023 London | 01:38:30 | |
| Tóth Bence | 2022 Wien | 01:38:04 | |
| Ranner Niclas | 2023 Hamburg | 01:38:34 | |
| Voetterl Mark | 2024 Sydney | 01:37:50 | |
| Giaquinta Thomas | 2024 Melbourne | 01:38:44 | |
| Critchlow Simon | 2022 Manchester | 01:38:42 | |
| Fries Manuel | 2023 München | 01:38:25 | |
| Hancox Andy | 2024 London | 01:38:44 | |
| Howe Gavin | 2022 Madrid | 01:38:18 | |
| Burchfield Scott | 2023 Melbourne | 01:38:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
