Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Hoek Eline's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Hoek Eline's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Hoek Eline's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Hoek Eline's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:21. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:39 | 06:11 to 04:32 | 49.3% |
| Run Total | 00:50 | 46:11 to 45:21 | 24.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:28 | 05:05 to 04:37 | 13.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:17 | 05:20 to 05:03 | 8.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:07 | 02:42 to 02:35 | 3.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:03 to 05:03 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:38 to 05:38 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:14 to 05:14 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:48 to 01:48 | 0.0% |
| Van Hoek Eline | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:56 | 00:00 | 05:10 -01:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:20 | 03:56 | 05:08 +00:12 | 05:10 -01:14 |
| Running 2 | 05:54 | 09:16 | 05:30 +00:24 | 10:18 -01:02 |
| Sled Push | 02:42 | 15:10 | 02:44 -00:02 | 15:48 -00:38 |
| Running 3 | 06:08 | 17:52 | 05:48 +00:20 | 18:32 -00:40 |
| Sled Pull | 05:03 | 24:00 | 05:50 -00:47 | 24:20 -00:20 |
| Running 4 | 05:58 | 29:03 | 05:50 +00:08 | 30:10 -01:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:38 | 35:01 | 06:13 -00:35 | 36:00 -00:59 |
| Running 5 | 06:03 | 40:39 | 05:58 +00:05 | 42:13 -01:34 |
| Rowing | 05:14 | 46:42 | 05:24 -00:10 | 48:11 -01:29 |
| Running 6 | 05:59 | 51:56 | 05:52 +00:07 | 53:35 -01:39 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:48 | 57:55 | 02:15 -00:27 | 59:27 -01:32 |
| Running 7 | 05:52 | 59:43 | 05:51 +00:01 | 01:01:42 -01:59 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:05 | 01:05:35 | 04:52 +00:13 | 01:07:33 -01:58 |
| Running 8 | 06:23 | 01:10:40 | 06:16 +00:07 | 01:12:25 -01:45 |
| Wall Balls | 06:11 | 01:17:03 | 04:58 +01:13 | 01:18:41 -01:38 |
| Roxzone | 07:28 | 01:30:35 | 06:56 +00:32 | 01:30:35 |
Eline Van Hoek delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 432 out of 3118 athletes, placing her in the top 13% overall and the top 15% in her age group (25-29). Her total running time was notably 41 seconds faster than average, indicating a strong running profile. However, considering the running segments from Running 1 to Running 4, Eline started out significantly faster than average but was slower in subsequent runs, suggesting a pacing strategy that might have been too aggressive initially. Her performance in strength-based exercises was variable, with standout performances in the Sled Pull and Farmer's Carry, but she struggled with the Wall Balls segment. This suggests a hybrid profile, with a slight edge in running but room for improvement in specific strength components.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Jemelen Mathilde | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:30:41 | |
| Gazzellini Gaia | 2024 Turin | 01:30:18 | |
| Fasano Claudia | 2024 Rimini | 01:30:56 | |
| Mchugh Tara | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:30:40 | |
| Bellout Nadia | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:31:04 | |
| Tastekin Gabriella | 2023 Stockholm | 01:30:10 | |
| Cooper Leanne | 2024 London | 01:30:50 | |
| Hair Rebecca | 2024 Paris | 01:30:44 | |
| Johnston Louise | 2024 Glasgow | 01:30:31 | |
| Gregson Emma | 2024 Dublin | 01:31:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
