Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Poznan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire Gilbride Tom's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gilbride Tom's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gilbride Tom's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gilbride Tom's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
06:20.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance:
Tom Gilbride, competing in the Age Group 30-34 category at the 2024 Poznan HYROX event, demonstrated a remarkable performance, ranking 112th in his age group and 412th overall. Tom showcased an impressive running profile, completing the total running time 05:24 faster than the average. However, his overall time was hampered by the slower performance in the strength-oriented segments, specifically the Roxzone, Wall Balls, and Farmers Carry. An examination of the pacing shows Tom started slower than average in the initial running segment, but then significantly picked up the pace in the subsequent segments, often ranking in the top 5 percentile.
Segments to Improve:
Roxzone: Tom's Roxzone time was 01:29 slower than average, indicating room for improvement in transition speed and overall fitness. To enhance performance in this area, specific drills focusing on agility and quick transitions could be beneficial. These may include ladder drills for agility, and practising transitioning between different exercises in quick succession to mimic race conditions.
Wall Balls: Wall Balls posed a substantial challenge, with Tom finishing 01:30 slower than average. To improve, Tom could incorporate more functional strength training into his routine, focusing on the lower body and core. Squats, lunges, and kettlebell swings could help build the required strength and endurance.
Farmers Carry: This segment was completed 01:20 slower than average, indicating a potential lack of grip strength and/or endurance. Deadlifts, pull-ups, and specific grip-strengthening exercises like farmers walks and wrist curls could help improve performance in this area.
Race Strategies:
Considering Tom's strengths and areas for improvement, it is recommended that he maintains a steady pace in the initial running segments, conserving energy for the strength-oriented tasks. This strategy can prevent early fatigue and allow for a stronger finish. To capitalize on his running strengths, Tom should aim to recover during the running segments, treating them as active recovery. Finally, practising the strength segments under fatigued conditions, similar to race conditions, could help improve his performance in these segments during the race.