Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cocomazzi Francesco's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cocomazzi Francesco's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cocomazzi Francesco's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cocomazzi Francesco's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:02. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:29 | 10:38 to 05:09 | 60.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:32 | 08:56 to 05:24 | 39.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:29 to 04:28 | 0.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:00 to 02:00 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:05 to 02:05 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:08 to 39:08 | 0.0% |
| Cocomazzi Francesco | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:25 | 00:00 | 04:47 +00:38 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 05:25 | 04:30 -00:01 | 04:47 +00:38 |
| Running 2 | 04:31 | 09:54 | 05:06 -00:35 | 09:17 +00:37 |
| Sled Push | 02:00 | 14:25 | 03:03 -01:03 | 14:23 +00:02 |
| Running 3 | 04:59 | 16:25 | 05:36 -00:37 | 17:26 -01:01 |
| Sled Pull | 04:51 | 21:24 | 05:12 -00:21 | 23:02 -01:38 |
| Running 4 | 04:59 | 26:15 | 05:35 -00:36 | 28:14 -01:59 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:56 | 31:14 | 05:41 +03:15 | 33:49 -02:35 |
| Running 5 | 05:05 | 40:10 | 05:46 -00:41 | 39:30 +00:40 |
| Rowing | 04:30 | 45:15 | 04:54 -00:24 | 45:16 -00:01 |
| Running 6 | 05:16 | 49:45 | 05:35 -00:19 | 50:10 -00:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:05 | 55:01 | 02:17 -00:12 | 55:45 -00:44 |
| Running 7 | 04:46 | 57:06 | 05:35 -00:49 | 58:02 -00:56 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 10:38 | 01:01:52 | 05:26 +05:12 | 01:03:37 -01:45 |
| Running 8 | 04:09 | 01:12:30 | 06:17 -02:08 | 01:09:03 +03:27 |
| Wall Balls | 04:21 | 01:16:39 | 06:55 -02:34 | 01:15:20 +01:19 |
| Roxzone | 08:40 | 01:29:34 | 07:19 +01:21 | 01:29:34 |
Francesco Cocomazzi showcased a commendable performance at the 2024 Milan Hyrox event, finishing in the top 48% of all athletes and ranking 45th in his age group. His overall time was 01:29:34 with a notably strong total running time of 00:39:08, which was 05:37 faster than the average. This indicates a strong running profile. However, his pacing strategy could be optimized, as initial running segments (Running 1 to Running 4) suggest a slightly slower start with a significant acceleration toward the end, particularly in Running 8. This might indicate energy conservation initially, but it may also suggest potential to optimize pacing more effectively throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bourke Garry | 2023 London | 01:29:43 | |
| Ferry Valentin | 2024 Paris | 01:29:07 | |
| Keel Christopher | 2024 Paris | 01:29:38 | |
| Scott Lucas | 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:04 | |
| Mackenzie James | 2023 London | 01:29:42 | |
| Fluhrer Michael | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:29:20 | |
| Neilson Brett | 2024 Sydney | 01:29:04 | |
| Van Riessen Christopher | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:29:57 | |
| Whelan Pa | 2024 Dublin | 01:29:22 | |
| Müller Eric | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:29:19 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rimini | 01:26:01 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
