Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Sheppard Gayle's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Sheppard Gayle's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Sheppard Gayle's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Sheppard Gayle's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:23. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:01 | 07:02 to 05:01 | 37.5% |
| Wall Balls | 01:45 | 05:50 to 04:05 | 32.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:40 | 03:03 to 02:23 | 12.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:24 | 05:19 to 04:55 | 7.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:18 | 02:19 to 02:01 | 5.6% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 05:20 to 05:10 | 3.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:05 | 05:23 to 05:18 | 1.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:48 to 03:48 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:55 to 40:55 | 0.0% |
| Sheppard Gayle | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:53 | 00:00 | 04:58 +00:55 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:19 | 05:53 | 05:02 +00:17 | 04:58 +00:55 |
| Running 2 | 04:52 | 11:12 | 05:18 -00:26 | 10:00 +01:12 |
| Sled Push | 03:03 | 16:04 | 02:35 +00:28 | 15:18 +00:46 |
| Running 3 | 04:51 | 19:07 | 05:35 -00:44 | 17:53 +01:14 |
| Sled Pull | 07:02 | 23:58 | 05:27 +01:35 | 23:28 +00:30 |
| Running 4 | 04:59 | 31:00 | 05:37 -00:38 | 28:55 +02:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:23 | 35:59 | 05:43 -00:20 | 34:32 +01:27 |
| Running 5 | 04:56 | 41:22 | 05:44 -00:48 | 40:15 +01:07 |
| Rowing | 05:20 | 46:18 | 05:17 +00:03 | 45:59 +00:19 |
| Running 6 | 05:06 | 51:38 | 05:38 -00:32 | 51:16 +00:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:19 | 56:44 | 02:11 +00:08 | 56:54 -00:10 |
| Running 7 | 05:00 | 59:03 | 05:37 -00:37 | 59:05 -00:02 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:48 | 01:04:03 | 04:30 -00:42 | 01:04:42 -00:39 |
| Running 8 | 05:21 | 01:07:51 | 05:59 -00:38 | 01:09:12 -01:21 |
| Wall Balls | 05:50 | 01:13:12 | 04:41 +01:09 | 01:15:11 -01:59 |
| Roxzone | 07:25 | 01:26:20 | 06:28 +00:57 | 01:26:20 |
Gayle Sheppard performed exceptionally well in the 2024 Birmingham race, ranking in the top 9% of all participants and the top 5% in her age group. Her overall time was 01:26:20, which is impressive considering the rigours of the competition. Sheppard's total running time was 00:40:55, which is 03:45 faster than the average. This clearly shows that her strength lies in running, where she consistently performed faster than average in all the running segments. However, her transition time (roxzone) was significantly slower than average, indicating that she might have taken more rest or had slower transitions.
Considering Sheppard's strengths and areas for improvement, we suggest the following race strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Davidson Georgie | 2023 London | 01:26:30 | |
| Shottes Meredith | 2019 New York | 01:26:18 | |
| Jahn Christine | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:26:19 | |
| Rutt Jennifer | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:25:53 | |
| Deschatrettes Amandine | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:26:21 | |
| Boettiger Nichola | 2024 Sydney | 01:26:25 | |
| Wilson Lauren | 2024 Sydney | 01:25:57 | |
| Knott Lilli | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:26:09 | |
| Roginska Marta | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:26:11 | |
| Emold Dana | 2022 Chicago | 01:26:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:41:53 | |
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:27:18 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
