Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Carson Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Carson Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Carson Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Carson Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:45 | 45:39 to 43:54 | 36.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:04 | 06:36 to 05:32 | 21.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:04 | 06:19 to 05:15 | 21.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:53 | 07:32 to 06:39 | 18.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 04:35 to 04:29 | 2.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:52 to 02:52 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:06 to 02:06 | 0.0% |
| Carson Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:42 | 00:00 | 04:45 -01:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:35 | 03:42 | 04:31 +00:04 | 04:45 -01:03 |
| Running 2 | 05:33 | 08:17 | 05:09 +00:24 | 09:16 -00:59 |
| Sled Push | 02:52 | 13:50 | 03:04 -00:12 | 14:25 -00:35 |
| Running 3 | 05:51 | 16:42 | 05:37 +00:14 | 17:29 -00:47 |
| Sled Pull | 04:33 | 22:33 | 05:16 -00:43 | 23:06 -00:33 |
| Running 4 | 06:12 | 27:06 | 05:37 +00:35 | 28:22 -01:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:36 | 33:18 | 05:48 +00:48 | 33:59 -00:41 |
| Running 5 | 06:05 | 39:54 | 05:49 +00:16 | 39:47 +00:07 |
| Rowing | 04:41 | 45:59 | 04:56 -00:15 | 45:36 +00:23 |
| Running 6 | 06:04 | 50:40 | 05:39 +00:25 | 50:32 +00:08 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 56:44 | 02:18 -00:12 | 56:11 +00:33 |
| Running 7 | 05:42 | 58:50 | 05:38 +00:04 | 58:29 +00:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:19 | 01:04:32 | 05:30 +00:49 | 01:04:07 +00:25 |
| Running 8 | 06:33 | 01:10:51 | 06:20 +00:13 | 01:09:37 +01:14 |
| Wall Balls | 07:32 | 01:17:24 | 07:00 +00:32 | 01:15:57 +01:27 |
| Roxzone | 05:36 | 01:30:25 | 07:28 -01:52 | 01:30:25 |
Mark Carson delivered a solid performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox, finishing in the top 43% overall and top 48% in his age group. His overall time of 01:30:25 demonstrates a commendable effort, though there are clear areas for improvement. Mark's pacing analysis indicates he started the race strong, particularly with an impressive Running 1 time, but his performance slightly waned in subsequent running segments. His total running time was slower than average by 00:40, suggesting that Mark has a stronger strength profile compared to his running capabilities, which aligns with his above-average performance in strength-based exercises such as Sled Push and Sled Pull.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Keenan Kieron | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:29:57 | |
| Fitzgerald Scott | 2023 Melbourne | 01:30:20 | |
| Beck William | 2024 Manchester | 01:30:14 | |
| Utz Markus | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:30:09 | |
| Troindl Michael | 2019 Wien | 01:29:58 | |
| He Songhua | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:29:55 | |
| Carson Mark | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:30:25 | |
| Yosfan Ari | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:30:25 | |
| Paulick Paul | 2023 München | 01:30:07 | |
| Furlong Sean | 2024 Dublin | 01:30:36 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Dublin | 01:34:33 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
