Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 881 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Smith Sarah's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Smith Sarah's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Smith Sarah's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Smith Sarah's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:44 | 41:58 to 39:14 | 49.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:18 | 05:41 to 04:23 | 23.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:38 | 02:40 to 02:02 | 11.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:21 | 05:02 to 04:41 | 6.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:21 | 04:01 to 03:40 | 6.4% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 05:00 to 04:55 | 1.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:03 | 03:25 to 03:22 | 0.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:41 to 01:41 | 0.0% |
| Smith Sarah | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:57 | 00:00 | 04:37 -00:40 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:02 | 03:57 | 04:52 +00:10 | 04:37 -00:40 |
| Running 2 | 05:06 | 08:59 | 04:52 +00:14 | 09:29 -00:30 |
| Sled Push | 02:40 | 14:05 | 02:25 +00:15 | 14:21 -00:16 |
| Running 3 | 05:26 | 16:45 | 05:07 +00:19 | 16:46 -00:01 |
| Sled Pull | 04:09 | 22:11 | 04:55 -00:46 | 21:53 +00:18 |
| Running 4 | 05:25 | 26:20 | 05:07 +00:18 | 26:48 -00:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:41 | 31:45 | 04:56 +00:45 | 31:55 -00:10 |
| Running 5 | 05:32 | 37:26 | 05:13 +00:19 | 36:51 +00:35 |
| Rowing | 05:00 | 42:58 | 05:05 -00:05 | 42:04 +00:54 |
| Running 6 | 05:27 | 47:58 | 05:10 +00:17 | 47:09 +00:49 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:41 | 53:25 | 02:00 -00:19 | 52:19 +01:06 |
| Running 7 | 05:32 | 55:06 | 05:07 +00:25 | 54:19 +00:47 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:01 | 01:00:38 | 04:02 -00:01 | 59:26 +01:12 |
| Running 8 | 05:37 | 01:04:39 | 05:25 +00:12 | 01:03:28 +01:11 |
| Wall Balls | 03:25 | 01:10:16 | 04:02 -00:37 | 01:08:53 +01:23 |
| Roxzone | 04:55 | 01:18:29 | 05:34 -00:39 | 01:18:29 |
Sarah's total running time was 00:41:58, which was 02:16 slower than the average for her finish time. This indicates that she may need to improve her overall running performance. However, her best running lap of 00:03:57 was 00:30 faster than average, highlighting her potential as a strong runner.
In conclusion, Sarah Smith demonstrated exceptional performance in the 2023 London Hyrox race, ranking in the top 4% of athletes in both the overall and age group categories. To further enhance her performance, Sarah should focus on improving her running endurance, explosive power, and transition efficiency. Incorporating specific training strategies, exercises, and drills tailored to her areas of improvement will help elevate her performance to the next level. With continued dedication and training, Sarah has the potential to achieve even greater success in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Grebe Marilena | 2024 Köln | 01:18:38 | |
| Chavanne Floriane | 2024 Paris | 01:18:21 | |
| ArreolaPerez Stephanie | 2024 Houston | 01:18:55 | |
| Assmann Alexandra | 2024 Hamburg | 01:18:34 | |
| Pappusch Sarah | 2024 Stockholm | 01:18:26 | |
| Walker Louise | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:18:34 | |
| Ormerod Helen | 2022 Manchester | 01:18:19 | |
| Siekkinen Lotta | 2023 Wien | 01:18:19 | |
| Cook Victoria | 2021 Birmingham | 01:18:13 | |
| Kiessig Birgit | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:18:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 London | 01:22:13 | |
| 2023 Glasgow | 01:48:02 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:39:31 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
