Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 86 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Marcus Clive's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Marcus Clive's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Marcus Clive's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Marcus Clive's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 16:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 09:09 | 01:08:48 to 59:39 | 55.1% |
| Sled Pull | 03:18 | 11:10 to 07:52 | 19.9% |
| Wall Balls | 02:34 | 13:51 to 11:17 | 15.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:42 | 05:49 to 05:07 | 4.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:30 | 08:56 to 08:26 | 3.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:23 | 03:43 to 03:20 | 2.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:34 to 07:34 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:24 to 05:24 | 0.0% |
| Marcus Clive | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:16 | 00:00 | 06:32 -01:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:49 | 05:16 | 05:16 +00:33 | 06:32 -01:16 |
| Running 2 | 06:37 | 11:05 | 07:14 -00:37 | 11:48 -00:43 |
| Sled Push | 04:39 | 17:42 | 04:55 -00:16 | 19:02 -01:20 |
| Running 3 | 10:05 | 22:21 | 08:29 +01:36 | 23:57 -01:36 |
| Sled Pull | 11:10 | 32:26 | 08:30 +02:40 | 32:26 +00:00 |
| Running 4 | 09:01 | 43:36 | 08:26 +00:35 | 40:56 +02:40 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:34 | 52:37 | 10:04 -02:30 | 49:22 +03:15 |
| Running 5 | 09:46 | 01:00:11 | 08:49 +00:57 | 59:26 +00:45 |
| Rowing | 05:24 | 01:09:57 | 05:52 -00:28 | 01:08:15 +01:42 |
| Running 6 | 08:41 | 01:15:21 | 08:28 +00:13 | 01:14:07 +01:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:43 | 01:24:02 | 03:27 +00:16 | 01:22:35 +01:27 |
| Running 7 | 08:28 | 01:27:45 | 08:27 +00:01 | 01:26:02 +01:43 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:56 | 01:36:13 | 09:53 -00:57 | 01:34:29 +01:44 |
| Running 8 | 10:58 | 01:45:09 | 11:21 -00:23 | 01:44:22 +00:47 |
| Wall Balls | 13:51 | 01:56:07 | 13:08 +00:43 | 01:55:43 +00:24 |
| Roxzone | 11:59 | 02:21:48 | 12:57 -00:58 | 02:21:48 |
Based on the splits analysis, Clive's best performance came in the Burpees Broad Jump segment, where he was 01:49 faster than the average time. He also performed well in the Sled Push segment, finishing 01:12 faster than average. However, he struggled in segments such as Running 3, Sled Pull, Wall Balls, and Running 5, where he lost significant time compared to the average.
Clive's total running time of 01:08:48 was 06:00 slower than average, indicating that he may need to focus on improving his running performance.
In summary, Clive Marcus showed potential in the Hyrox race but can make improvements in several areas to enhance his performance. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as improving running endurance, building upper body strength, and refining running technique, he can work towards achieving better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Latiff Hudzaifah | 2023 Singapore | 02:21:26 | |
| Chia Chris | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 02:21:32 | |
| Melchers Alexander | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 02:22:00 | |
| Polut Darius | 2024 Poznan | 02:21:38 | |
| Lopez Cuevas Aaron | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 02:21:31 | |
| Nash Terry | 2024 Birmingham | 02:22:10 | |
| Ahlers Lars | 2024 Hamburg | 02:21:20 | |
| Elsesser Stephan | 2024 Frankfurt | 02:22:06 | |
| Pape Noah | 2019 Hamburg | 02:21:41 | |
| Wilkerson Terrance | 2023 New York | 02:21:42 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Brisbane | 02:11:37 | |
| 2023 London | 02:21:57 | |
| 2024 Manchester | 02:07:28 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
