Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Green Kimberly's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Green Kimberly's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Green Kimberly's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Green Kimberly's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:58 | 07:28 to 06:30 | 38.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:49 | 05:51 to 05:02 | 32.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:28 | 05:36 to 05:08 | 18.7% |
| Run Total | 00:12 | 48:02 to 47:50 | 8.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:03 | 02:20 to 02:17 | 2.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:06 to 05:06 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:38 to 02:38 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:13 to 05:13 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:19 to 05:19 | 0.0% |
| Green Kimberly | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:45 | 00:00 | 05:22 -00:37 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:06 | 04:45 | 05:14 -00:08 | 05:22 -00:37 |
| Running 2 | 05:50 | 09:51 | 05:45 +00:05 | 10:36 -00:45 |
| Sled Push | 02:38 | 15:41 | 02:54 -00:16 | 16:21 -00:40 |
| Running 3 | 05:54 | 18:19 | 06:05 -00:11 | 19:15 -00:56 |
| Sled Pull | 05:13 | 24:13 | 06:12 -00:59 | 25:20 -01:07 |
| Running 4 | 06:05 | 29:26 | 06:05 +00:00 | 31:32 -02:06 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:28 | 35:31 | 06:46 +00:42 | 37:37 -02:06 |
| Running 5 | 06:08 | 42:59 | 06:14 -00:06 | 44:23 -01:24 |
| Rowing | 05:19 | 49:07 | 05:31 -00:12 | 50:37 -01:30 |
| Running 6 | 06:17 | 54:26 | 06:08 +00:09 | 56:08 -01:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:20 | 01:00:43 | 02:24 -00:04 | 01:02:16 -01:33 |
| Running 7 | 06:16 | 01:03:03 | 06:07 +00:09 | 01:04:40 -01:37 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:51 | 01:09:19 | 05:12 +00:39 | 01:10:47 -01:28 |
| Running 8 | 06:49 | 01:15:10 | 06:38 +00:11 | 01:15:59 -00:49 |
| Wall Balls | 05:36 | 01:21:59 | 05:31 +00:05 | 01:22:37 -00:38 |
| Roxzone | 08:17 | 01:35:45 | 07:37 +00:40 | 01:35:45 |
One key highlight is Kimberly's excellent performance in the running 1 and Ski Erg segments, where she was faster than average. This indicates that she has a strong running profile and good cardiovascular endurance. However, she struggled in segments such as the Burpees Broad Jump, Roxzone, Sandbag Lunges, Run Total, and Wall Balls, where she lost significant time compared to the average.
Additionally, Kimberly should focus on efficient transitions between segments to minimize time spent in the Roxzone. Practicing quick and smooth transitions during training can help her save valuable time during the race.
Lastly, it is crucial for Kimberly to stay mentally focused and motivated throughout the race. Setting small goals for each segment and maintaining a positive mindset can help her push through challenging moments and perform at her best.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating the suggested training exercises and techniques, Kimberly Green can improve her performance in the identified areas and further excel in future HYROX races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 付 瑶 | 2024 Beijing | 01:36:06 | |
| Pickard Jenny | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:35:44 | |
| Damian Elise | 2024 New York | 01:35:49 | |
| Greenwood Lucy | 2024 Birmingham | 01:35:48 | |
| Savino Anna | 2024 Anaheim | 01:35:21 | |
| Gange Bronte | 2024 Melbourne | 01:35:31 | |
| Campbell Iman | 2023 Dubai | 01:35:23 | |
| Sørensen Mette | 2023 Malmö | 01:35:52 | |
| Etchells Shawnie | 2024 Manchester | 01:35:46 | |
| Mungenast Lisa Maria | 2023 München | 01:35:18 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
