Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Evans Rachel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Evans Rachel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Evans Rachel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Evans Rachel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:17 | 06:22 to 05:05 | 34.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:48 | 05:38 to 04:50 | 21.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:28 | 04:36 to 04:08 | 12.4% |
| Run Total | 00:28 | 42:41 to 42:13 | 12.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:24 | 05:16 to 04:52 | 10.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:20 | 02:38 to 02:18 | 8.9% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:40 to 01:40 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:50 to 03:50 | 0.0% |
| Evans Rachel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:32 | 00:00 | 04:52 -00:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:16 | 04:32 | 05:00 +00:16 | 04:52 -00:20 |
| Running 2 | 05:27 | 09:48 | 05:14 +00:13 | 09:52 -00:04 |
| Sled Push | 02:38 | 15:15 | 02:35 +00:03 | 15:06 +00:09 |
| Running 3 | 05:24 | 17:53 | 05:28 -00:04 | 17:41 +00:12 |
| Sled Pull | 05:38 | 23:17 | 05:18 +00:20 | 23:09 +00:08 |
| Running 4 | 05:34 | 28:55 | 05:29 +00:05 | 28:27 +00:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:22 | 34:29 | 05:30 +00:52 | 33:56 +00:33 |
| Running 5 | 05:37 | 40:51 | 05:37 +00:00 | 39:26 +01:25 |
| Rowing | 04:55 | 46:28 | 05:14 -00:19 | 45:03 +01:25 |
| Running 6 | 05:33 | 51:23 | 05:31 +00:02 | 50:17 +01:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:40 | 56:56 | 02:08 -00:28 | 55:48 +01:08 |
| Running 7 | 05:16 | 58:36 | 05:29 -00:13 | 57:56 +00:40 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:36 | 01:03:52 | 04:23 +00:13 | 01:03:25 +00:27 |
| Running 8 | 05:21 | 01:08:28 | 05:50 -00:29 | 01:07:48 +00:40 |
| Wall Balls | 03:50 | 01:13:49 | 04:25 -00:35 | 01:13:38 +00:11 |
| Roxzone | 06:47 | 01:24:18 | 06:15 +00:32 | 01:24:18 |
In terms of pacing, Rachel's splits indicate that she generally maintained a consistent pace throughout the race. However, it is worth noting that her total running time of 00:42:41 was 00:28 slower than the average. This suggests that she may benefit from improving her overall fitness and transition time in order to decrease the time spent in the roxzone. Additionally, her best running lap time of 00:04:32 indicates that she has good speed and potential as a runner.
Overall, Rachel Evans had a strong performance in the 2023 London Hyrox race. By implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, she can further improve her performance and continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Radaelli Cristiana | 2024 Rimini | 01:24:15 | |
| Okowa Patricia | 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:21 | |
| Marcos Borrego Laura | 2023 Barcelona | 01:24:01 | |
| Harrison Ameyah | 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:27 | |
| Shenton Nicola | 2024 Glasgow | 01:24:45 | |
| Tebar Blanca | 2023 London | 01:24:27 | |
| Bedwell Sophie | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:24:06 | |
| Bowkett Pippa | 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:16 | |
| Zahed Charlène | 2024 Marseille | 01:24:07 | |
| ScottHeale Pippa | 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:46 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Hamburg | 01:19:53 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
