Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 786 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hara Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hara Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hara Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hara Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:58 | 08:20 to 07:22 | 44.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:49 | 04:37 to 03:48 | 37.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:20 | 03:07 to 02:47 | 15.3% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 05:23 to 05:19 | 3.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:19 to 06:19 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:52 to 05:52 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 51:37 to 51:37 | 0.0% |
| Hara Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:14 | 00:00 | 05:25 -00:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:35 | 05:14 | 04:47 -00:12 | 05:25 -00:11 |
| Running 2 | 05:17 | 09:49 | 05:57 -00:40 | 10:12 -00:23 |
| Sled Push | 04:37 | 15:06 | 03:44 +00:53 | 16:09 -01:03 |
| Running 3 | 07:30 | 19:43 | 06:38 +00:52 | 19:53 -00:10 |
| Sled Pull | 04:36 | 27:13 | 06:28 -01:52 | 26:31 +00:42 |
| Running 4 | 06:26 | 31:49 | 06:37 -00:11 | 32:59 -01:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:20 | 38:15 | 07:30 +00:50 | 39:36 -01:21 |
| Running 5 | 06:52 | 46:35 | 06:57 -00:05 | 47:06 -00:31 |
| Rowing | 05:23 | 53:27 | 05:18 +00:05 | 54:03 -00:36 |
| Running 6 | 06:27 | 58:50 | 06:42 -00:15 | 59:21 -00:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:07 | 01:05:17 | 02:46 +00:21 | 01:06:03 -00:46 |
| Running 7 | 05:56 | 01:08:24 | 06:45 -00:49 | 01:08:49 -00:25 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:19 | 01:14:20 | 07:02 -00:43 | 01:15:34 -01:14 |
| Running 8 | 07:58 | 01:20:39 | 08:09 -00:11 | 01:22:36 -01:57 |
| Wall Balls | 05:52 | 01:28:37 | 09:08 -03:16 | 01:30:45 -02:08 |
| Roxzone | 15:23 | 01:49:43 | 09:50 +05:33 | 01:49:43 |
Based on the splits analysis, Mark's total running time of 00:51:37 was 01:17 slower than the average. This suggests that he may benefit from improving his overall fitness and transition time between exercise zones. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:05:14 indicates that he has the potential to excel in running.
Overall, Mark Hara has shown great potential in the HYROX race. By focusing on improving his overall fitness, transition time, and specific areas of weakness identified in the splits analysis, he can enhance his performance in future races. Incorporating the suggested training strategies, exercises, and race strategies into his training routine will enable him to reach his full potential as a fitness athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Goh Nathaniel | 2024 Singapore | 01:50:08 | |
| Symes Fred | 2022 London | 01:50:13 | |
| Ragan Dan | 2022 Dallas | 01:49:54 | |
| Krause Robert | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:49:49 | |
| White Tommy | 2021 Dallas | 01:49:20 | |
| Röcher Fabian | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:50:01 | |
| Baric Tomislav | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:49:34 | |
| Pivac Miro | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:49:31 | |
| Mielnicki Sebastian | 2024 Gdansk | 01:49:53 | |
| Mesham Steven | 2024 Birmingham | 01:49:46 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 London | 02:08:26 | |
| 2023 London | 01:42:52 | |
| 2023 London | 01:40:10 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
