Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 811 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Laarhoven Johan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Laarhoven Johan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Laarhoven Johan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Laarhoven Johan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:37. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:54 | 54:31 to 51:37 | 62.8% |
| Wall Balls | 01:16 | 10:12 to 08:56 | 27.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:23 | 07:10 to 06:47 | 8.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 04:54 to 04:50 | 1.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:08 to 03:08 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:50 to 05:50 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:16 to 07:16 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:19 to 05:19 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:20 to 02:20 | 0.0% |
| Van Laarhoven Johan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:46 | 00:00 | 05:25 -01:39 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:54 | 03:46 | 04:47 +00:07 | 05:25 -01:39 |
| Running 2 | 05:44 | 08:40 | 05:57 -00:13 | 10:12 -01:32 |
| Sled Push | 03:08 | 14:24 | 03:43 -00:35 | 16:09 -01:45 |
| Running 3 | 09:36 | 17:32 | 06:38 +02:58 | 19:52 -02:20 |
| Sled Pull | 05:50 | 27:08 | 06:30 -00:40 | 26:30 +00:38 |
| Running 4 | 06:21 | 32:58 | 06:37 -00:16 | 33:00 -00:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:16 | 39:19 | 07:31 -00:15 | 39:37 -00:18 |
| Running 5 | 07:02 | 46:35 | 06:57 +00:05 | 47:08 -00:33 |
| Rowing | 05:19 | 53:37 | 05:20 -00:01 | 54:05 -00:28 |
| Running 6 | 07:06 | 58:56 | 06:42 +00:24 | 59:25 -00:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:20 | 01:06:02 | 02:48 -00:28 | 01:06:07 -00:05 |
| Running 7 | 07:14 | 01:08:22 | 06:45 +00:29 | 01:08:55 -00:33 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:10 | 01:15:36 | 07:00 +00:10 | 01:15:40 -00:04 |
| Running 8 | 07:46 | 01:22:46 | 08:11 -00:25 | 01:22:40 +00:06 |
| Wall Balls | 10:12 | 01:30:32 | 09:10 +01:02 | 01:30:51 -00:19 |
| Roxzone | 09:20 | 01:49:56 | 09:55 -00:35 | 01:49:56 |
Johan Van Laarhoven delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, placing in the top 64% overall and top 62% in his age group. His overall time of 01:49:56 shows room for improvement, especially in running, where his total running time was 53 seconds slower than average. His performance in the first running segment was notably strong, indicating a fast start, but he struggled significantly in Running 3, suggesting possible fatigue or pacing issues. Analysis of his total running time alongside strength events suggests Johan has a balanced profile, with strengths in certain strength components like the Sled Push.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Zehetner Clemens | 2022 Basel | 01:50:00 | |
| Brown Shane | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:49:38 | |
| Ubam Othniel | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:49:39 | |
| Atkins Brett | 2024 London | 01:50:07 | |
| Cheung Calvin | 2024 Incheon | 01:49:56 | |
| Mcnaughton Philip | 2024 London | 01:49:56 | |
| Conley Leam | 2024 London | 01:50:07 | |
| Gridley Ben | 2024 Birmingham | 01:50:12 | |
| Schreiber Yannic | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:49:29 | |
| Davies Ryan | 2021 Chicago | 01:50:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:46:39 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
