Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2018 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hofmann Knut's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hofmann Knut's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hofmann Knut's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hofmann Knut's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:25 | 05:40 to 04:15 | 37.6% |
| Run Total | 00:46 | 40:12 to 39:26 | 20.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:42 | 06:12 to 05:30 | 18.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:23 | 04:53 to 04:30 | 10.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:11 | 02:39 to 02:28 | 4.9% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 04:45 to 04:36 | 4.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:07 | 04:33 to 04:26 | 3.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 01:56 to 01:54 | 0.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:17 to 04:16 | 0.4% |
| Hofmann Knut | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:24 | 00:00 | 04:24 -01:00 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:17 | 03:24 | 04:22 -00:05 | 04:24 -01:00 |
| Running 2 | 04:35 | 07:41 | 04:45 -00:10 | 08:46 -01:05 |
| Sled Push | 02:39 | 12:16 | 02:45 -00:06 | 13:31 -01:15 |
| Running 3 | 05:14 | 14:55 | 05:08 +00:06 | 16:16 -01:21 |
| Sled Pull | 05:40 | 20:09 | 04:37 +01:03 | 21:24 -01:15 |
| Running 4 | 05:15 | 25:49 | 05:07 +00:08 | 26:01 -00:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:53 | 31:04 | 04:57 -00:04 | 31:08 -00:04 |
| Running 5 | 05:14 | 35:57 | 05:16 -00:02 | 36:05 -00:08 |
| Rowing | 04:45 | 41:11 | 04:42 +00:03 | 41:21 -00:10 |
| Running 6 | 05:12 | 45:56 | 05:09 +00:03 | 46:03 -00:07 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:56 | 51:08 | 02:04 -00:08 | 51:12 -00:04 |
| Running 7 | 05:07 | 53:04 | 05:07 +00:00 | 53:16 -00:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:33 | 58:11 | 04:46 -00:13 | 58:23 -00:12 |
| Running 8 | 06:15 | 01:02:44 | 05:37 +00:38 | 01:03:09 -00:25 |
| Wall Balls | 06:12 | 01:08:59 | 06:02 +00:10 | 01:08:46 +00:13 |
| Roxzone | 05:53 | 01:21:04 | 06:16 -00:23 | 01:21:04 |
In terms of his overall time, Knut completed the race in 01:21:04. His total running time was 00:40:12, which was 00:59 slower than the average. This indicates that Knut may need to focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time to enhance his performance in the race. Additionally, his best running lap was completed in an impressive time of 00:03:24, which was 00:52 faster than the average. This highlights Knut's strength as a runner and suggests that he should continue to train and improve his running abilities.
In conclusion, Knut Hofmann performed exceptionally well in the Hyrox race in Hamburg, demonstrating his strength and dedication as a fitness athlete. To further enhance his performance, he should focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time, particularly in segments such as Run Total, Sled Pull, Running 8, and Burpees Broad Jump. By incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, he can improve his performance in these areas and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tsalafoutas Vangelis | 2024 Milan | 01:21:17 | |
| Boulay Nico | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:21:00 | |
| Ubhi Mohinder Paul | 2024 Birmingham | 01:21:06 | |
| Safner Saša | 2019 Essen | 01:20:58 | |
| Lazaro Sylvain | 2024 Marseille | 01:20:34 | |
| Azzola Jacopo | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:21:20 | |
| Ilgar Ogul Can | 2024 Manchester | 01:21:16 | |
| Nizzoli Davide | 2024 Turin | 01:20:44 | |
| Benezra Gustavsson David Patrick | 2023 Malaga | 01:20:49 | |
| Mcmillan Matthew | 2024 Manchester | 01:20:57 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2019 Hamburg | 01:19:40 | |
| 2022 Hamburg | 01:26:13 | |
| 2023 Hamburg | 01:24:04 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
