Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Frankfurt using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Keßner Dietmar's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Keßner Dietmar's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Keßner Dietmar's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Keßner Dietmar's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:49 | 42:15 to 39:26 | 59.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:38 | 05:08 to 04:30 | 13.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:34 | 06:04 to 05:30 | 11.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:20 | 04:36 to 04:16 | 7.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:15 | 02:09 to 01:54 | 5.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:10 | 04:25 to 04:15 | 3.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:03 to 02:03 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:55 to 03:55 | 0.0% |
| Keßner Dietmar | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:32 | 00:00 | 04:24 +00:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:36 | 04:32 | 04:22 +00:14 | 04:24 +00:08 |
| Running 2 | 04:46 | 09:08 | 04:45 +00:01 | 08:46 +00:22 |
| Sled Push | 02:03 | 13:54 | 02:45 -00:42 | 13:31 +00:23 |
| Running 3 | 05:05 | 15:57 | 05:09 -00:04 | 16:16 -00:19 |
| Sled Pull | 04:25 | 21:02 | 04:38 -00:13 | 21:25 -00:23 |
| Running 4 | 05:19 | 25:27 | 05:07 +00:12 | 26:03 -00:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:08 | 30:46 | 04:56 +00:12 | 31:10 -00:24 |
| Running 5 | 05:31 | 35:54 | 05:16 +00:15 | 36:06 -00:12 |
| Rowing | 04:36 | 41:25 | 04:42 -00:06 | 41:22 +00:03 |
| Running 6 | 05:24 | 46:01 | 05:09 +00:15 | 46:04 -00:03 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 51:25 | 02:04 +00:05 | 51:13 +00:12 |
| Running 7 | 05:17 | 53:34 | 05:07 +00:10 | 53:17 +00:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:55 | 58:51 | 04:46 -00:51 | 58:24 +00:27 |
| Running 8 | 06:26 | 01:02:46 | 05:37 +00:49 | 01:03:10 -00:24 |
| Wall Balls | 06:04 | 01:09:12 | 06:01 +00:03 | 01:08:47 +00:25 |
| Roxzone | 05:57 | 01:21:05 | 06:17 -00:20 | 01:21:05 |
Keßner's total running time was 00:42:15, which was 03:00 slower than the average time for his finish. This indicates that he may need to improve his overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, his best running lap was 00:04:32, which was 00:15 slower than the average.
Additionally, Keßner should focus on efficient transitions between exercises. The Roxzone time, which is the time spent between exercise zones, was 00:06 faster than the average for his finish. He should aim to minimize transition time by practicing smooth transitions during his training sessions.
Overall, Keßner's performance in the 2023 Frankfurt Hyrox race was commendable. With targeted training strategies and techniques, particularly focusing on improving his overall fitness, strength, and running performance, he can further enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrer Rivera Juan Guillermo | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:21:28 | |
| Agnew Chrissy | 2024 Milan | 01:21:30 | |
| Warner Carl | 2024 Dublin | 01:21:12 | |
| Klinkert Sjuul | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:20:49 | |
| Hickey Paul | 2023 Malmö | 01:21:31 | |
| Seitz Rüdiger | 2019 Nürnberg | 01:20:47 | |
| Tate Ashley | 2022 Birmingham | 01:20:49 | |
| Camozzi Corrado | 2024 Milan | 01:21:05 | |
| López Dávila Tomas | 2023 Valencia | 01:21:25 | |
| Longarte Galnares Álvaro | 2024 Bilbao | 01:21:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
