Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Frankfurt using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 237 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Eckhardt Sonja's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Eckhardt Sonja's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Eckhardt Sonja's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Eckhardt Sonja's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 13:54. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 10:47 | 01:08:43 to 57:56 | 77.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:38 | 08:26 to 06:48 | 11.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:29 | 10:46 to 09:17 | 10.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:12 to 02:12 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:07 to 02:07 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:31 to 05:31 | 0.0% |
| Eckhardt Sonja | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:08 | 00:00 | 06:26 +00:42 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:56 | 07:08 | 05:39 -00:43 | 06:26 +00:42 |
| Running 2 | 08:03 | 12:04 | 06:58 +01:05 | 12:05 -00:01 |
| Sled Push | 02:12 | 20:07 | 03:35 -01:23 | 19:03 +01:04 |
| Running 3 | 08:20 | 22:19 | 07:29 +00:51 | 22:38 -00:19 |
| Sled Pull | 04:53 | 30:39 | 08:04 -03:11 | 30:07 +00:32 |
| Running 4 | 08:29 | 35:32 | 07:32 +00:57 | 38:11 -02:39 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:46 | 44:01 | 09:46 +01:00 | 45:43 -01:42 |
| Running 5 | 09:05 | 54:47 | 07:56 +01:09 | 55:29 -00:42 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 01:03:52 | 06:06 -01:02 | 01:03:25 +00:27 |
| Running 6 | 08:45 | 01:08:56 | 07:45 +01:00 | 01:09:31 -00:35 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:07 | 01:17:41 | 02:55 -00:48 | 01:17:16 +00:25 |
| Running 7 | 09:03 | 01:19:48 | 07:45 +01:18 | 01:20:11 -00:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:26 | 01:28:51 | 07:12 +01:14 | 01:27:56 +00:55 |
| Running 8 | 09:54 | 01:37:17 | 08:58 +00:56 | 01:35:08 +02:09 |
| Wall Balls | 05:31 | 01:47:11 | 07:49 -02:18 | 01:44:06 +03:05 |
| Roxzone | 09:28 | 02:02:02 | 10:07 -00:39 | 02:02:02 |
Based on the analysis of her splits, Sonja had strengths in the Ski Erg and Sled Push segments, where she performed faster than the average. She also excelled in the Sled Pull and Rowing segments, where she was significantly faster than the average. However, she struggled in the Running 1, Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, and Running 8 segments, where she was slower than the average. The segments with the most time lost were Run Total, Burpees Broad Jump, Running 7, Sandbag Lunges, Running 2, Best Lap, Running 5, Running 1, Running 4, Running 6, Running 3, and Running 8.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ljubicic Diana | 2023 Hamburg | 02:02:29 | |
| Chalopin Caroline | 2024 Bordeaux | 02:02:13 | |
| Chung Haidee | 2023 London | 02:01:50 | |
| Boyer Amandine | 2024 Marseille | 02:01:56 | |
| Lechermann Julia | 2023 München | 02:02:04 | |
| Spreitzer Hajni | 2021 London | 02:01:47 | |
| Martin Kassie | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 02:02:22 | |
| Weber Katrin | 2024 Stuttgart | 02:02:30 | |
| Mohamed Raffick Nasyitah | 2024 Singapore | 02:02:22 | |
| Gysbers Bridgot | 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 02:02:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:49:10 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
