Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
499 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Run, Baby, Run!
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
Based on 499 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Station Showdown
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Based on 499 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Fast, slow, or steady?
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
Based on 499 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Expected Finish Time
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station.
Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
Spread of Splits Time
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
10:49.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 499 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance:
Tom Knierim, in the HYROX race, exhibited a commendable performance, ranking within the top 64% of athletes in his age group. His overall performance reveals that he excels in strength-based segments, such as the Sled Push and Wall Balls, where he finished significantly faster than the average. However, his 'Total running time' was slower than average, indicating a need for more focused running training. His pacing in the initial running segments was faster than average, suggesting a strong start but possibly leading to fatigue in later parts of the race.
Segments to Improve:
Running: Tom's total running time was slower than average, impacting his overall time. Greater focus on running training may help improve this. Long-distance running, interval training, and hill sprints can be incorporated into his training routine. Appropriate pacing strategies should also be adopted to avoid early exhaustion.
Sandbag Lunges: Tom's performance was slower in the Sandbag Lunges segment. Specific strength training for the lower body, particularly the quadriceps and glutes, can help improve performance. Exercises such as weighted lunges, squats, and deadlifts can be beneficial.
Burpees Broad Jump: This segment was another area where Tom's performance was slower than average. Incorporating plyometric exercises like box jumps, jump squats, and burpees in regular training can help improve explosive strength and agility, thereby improving performance in this segment.
Sled Pull: Tom's performance in the Sled Pull segment was slower, indicating a need for targeted training. Incorporating strength training exercises like deadlifts, barbell rows, and farmer's walk can help improve pulling strength.
Race Strategies:
To improve overall performance and ranking, Tom should consider the following strategies:
Effective Pacing: Starting too fast can lead to premature exhaustion. Tom should aim to maintain a steady pace throughout the race, saving energy for the final segments.
Transition Efficiency: Minimizing the transition time between segments can contribute significantly to a better finish time. Practicing quick transitions during training sessions can help improve efficiency during the race.
Strength and Endurance Training: Given that Tom's performance was better in strength-based segments, he should continue to focus on strength training but also allocate more time for endurance exercises. This balanced approach will help improve both running and strength-based segments.