Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 172 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Farley Mitch's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Farley Mitch's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Farley Mitch's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Farley Mitch's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 13:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 08:01 | 01:06:27 to 58:26 | 60.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:12 | 11:23 to 08:11 | 24.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:49 | 10:41 to 08:52 | 13.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 03:20 to 03:15 | 0.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 05:08 to 05:05 | 0.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:17 to 03:17 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:05 to 06:05 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:20 to 05:20 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 09:06 to 09:06 | 0.0% |
| Farley Mitch | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:23 | 00:00 | 06:01 -01:38 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:08 | 04:23 | 05:04 +00:04 | 06:01 -01:38 |
| Running 2 | 06:58 | 09:31 | 07:04 -00:06 | 11:05 -01:34 |
| Sled Push | 03:17 | 16:29 | 04:17 -01:00 | 18:09 -01:40 |
| Running 3 | 07:52 | 19:46 | 08:02 -00:10 | 22:26 -02:40 |
| Sled Pull | 06:05 | 27:38 | 07:49 -01:44 | 30:28 -02:50 |
| Running 4 | 10:56 | 33:43 | 08:02 +02:54 | 38:17 -04:34 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:41 | 44:39 | 09:11 +01:30 | 46:19 -01:40 |
| Running 5 | 08:01 | 55:20 | 08:43 -00:42 | 55:30 -00:10 |
| Rowing | 05:20 | 01:03:21 | 05:46 -00:26 | 01:04:13 -00:52 |
| Running 6 | 09:07 | 01:08:41 | 08:22 +00:45 | 01:09:59 -01:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:20 | 01:17:48 | 03:10 +00:10 | 01:18:21 -00:33 |
| Running 7 | 08:59 | 01:21:08 | 08:12 +00:47 | 01:21:31 -00:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 11:23 | 01:30:07 | 08:51 +02:32 | 01:29:43 +00:24 |
| Running 8 | 10:14 | 01:41:30 | 11:17 -01:03 | 01:38:34 +02:56 |
| Wall Balls | 09:06 | 01:51:44 | 11:39 -02:33 | 01:49:51 +01:53 |
| Roxzone | 13:35 | 02:14:17 | 12:47 +00:48 | 02:14:17 |
Mitch Farley's performance at the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox race demonstrates a mixed profile with a slight inclination towards strength exercises. Although his overall rank is within the top 57% of athletes, certain segments highlight his exceptional capabilities, notably his strength events like the Sled Push and Sled Pull. His total running time was only marginally slower than average, suggesting a balanced runner and strength profile. However, a notable observation is the significant drop in pace during the Running 4 segment, indicating potential fatigue or pacing misjudgment. While he started strong, especially in Running 1, maintaining that intensity proved challenging in the later stages.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Finnigan David | 2024 Manchester | 02:14:40 | |
| Viñas Robles Arturo | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 02:14:22 | |
| Evans Tecwyn | 2023 Manchester | 02:14:25 | |
| Ruiz Carlos | 2022 Dallas | 02:14:02 | |
| Guarnizo Zapata Joshua | 2024 Rotterdam | 02:14:19 | |
| Ka Ching Marco Lee | 2024 Hong Kong | 02:14:05 | |
| Hewitt Kelvin | 2022 London | 02:14:25 | |
| Kuttner Ron | 2023 Dublin | 02:14:03 | |
| Christie Toby | 2024 Glasgow | 02:14:11 | |
| Thomas Mithun Babu | 2024 Birmingham | 02:13:56 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
