Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire To Paul's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights To Paul's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the To Paul's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve To Paul's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:20. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:39 | 04:56 to 04:17 | 19.5% |
| Run Total | 00:36 | 39:07 to 38:31 | 18.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:30 | 04:44 to 04:14 | 15.0% |
| Rowing | 00:30 | 05:03 to 04:33 | 15.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:29 | 04:35 to 04:06 | 14.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:27 | 02:50 to 02:23 | 13.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 01:59 to 01:50 | 4.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| To Paul | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:38 | 00:00 | 04:20 -00:42 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:44 | 03:38 | 04:20 +00:24 | 04:20 -00:42 |
| Running 2 | 04:42 | 08:22 | 04:38 +00:04 | 08:40 -00:18 |
| Sled Push | 02:50 | 13:04 | 02:40 +00:10 | 13:18 -00:14 |
| Running 3 | 04:49 | 15:54 | 05:01 -00:12 | 15:58 -00:04 |
| Sled Pull | 04:35 | 20:43 | 04:27 +00:08 | 20:59 -00:16 |
| Running 4 | 05:11 | 25:18 | 05:00 +00:11 | 25:26 -00:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:56 | 30:29 | 04:41 +00:15 | 30:26 +00:03 |
| Running 5 | 05:07 | 35:25 | 05:09 -00:02 | 35:07 +00:18 |
| Rowing | 05:03 | 40:32 | 04:39 +00:24 | 40:16 +00:16 |
| Running 6 | 05:14 | 45:35 | 05:02 +00:12 | 44:55 +00:40 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:59 | 50:49 | 02:01 -00:02 | 49:57 +00:52 |
| Running 7 | 05:05 | 52:48 | 05:01 +00:04 | 51:58 +00:50 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:15 | 57:53 | 04:35 -00:20 | 56:59 +00:54 |
| Running 8 | 05:25 | 01:02:08 | 05:28 -00:03 | 01:01:34 +00:34 |
| Wall Balls | 04:16 | 01:07:33 | 05:46 -01:30 | 01:07:02 +00:31 |
| Roxzone | 07:04 | 01:18:46 | 05:58 +01:06 | 01:18:46 |
Paul To's performance in the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier HYROX race was commendable. He ranked well within the top 20% in the 30-34 age group, demonstrating a strong performance. His total running time was faster than average, indicating a strong runner profile. He started the race exceptionally well, with a running time that was significantly faster than average. However, his performance in the roxzone indicates he took more time in transitions, which suggests a potential area for improvement.
Considering Paul's performance, a few race strategies could help him improve his overall time. To start with, he could try to maintain a consistent pace throughout the running segments instead of starting too fast. This would aid in conserving energy for later segments where his performance tends to drop. Furthermore, focusing on a quick recovery post strength segments would help him regain his running pace more efficiently. Finally, practicing efficient transition techniques between exercises would significantly reduce his time spent in the Roxzone.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Howe Greg | 2024 Birmingham | 01:18:59 | |
| Fawcett Harvey | 2024 Birmingham | 01:19:10 | |
| Doherty Philip | 2024 Dublin | 01:19:04 | |
| Murray Ciaran | 2024 Dublin | 01:19:11 | |
| Holdinghausen Alexander | 2023 Melbourne | 01:19:08 | |
| Miele Joseph | 2023 New York | 01:18:45 | |
| Heng Nate | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:18:32 | |
| Ploeger Vincent | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:18:55 | |
| Dodd Jamie | 2024 Manchester | 01:18:18 | |
| Bongers Tom | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:18:24 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:38:37 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
