Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:06 (From 43:14 to 41:08) | 56.0% |
| Sled Pull | 01:01 (From 05:34 to 04:33) | 27.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:26 (From 03:05 to 02:39) | 11.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 (From 04:27 to 04:21) | 2.7% |
| BBJ | 00:06 (From 04:59 to 04:53) | 2.7% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:29 to 04:29) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 02:01 to 02:01) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 04:02 to 04:02) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 05:20 to 05:20) | 0.0% |
| Griffon Tom | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:24 | 00:00 | 04:35 -00:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:27 | 04:24 | 04:25 +00:02 | 04:35 -00:11 |
| Running 2 | 06:37 | 08:51 | 04:54 +01:43 | 09:00 -00:09 |
| Sled Push | 03:05 | 15:28 | 02:51 +00:14 | 13:54 +01:34 |
| Running 3 | 04:58 | 18:33 | 05:20 -00:22 | 16:45 +01:48 |
| Sled Pull | 05:34 | 23:31 | 04:51 +00:43 | 22:05 +01:26 |
| Running 4 | 05:00 | 29:05 | 05:19 -00:19 | 26:56 +02:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:59 | 34:05 | 05:13 -00:14 | 32:15 +01:50 |
| Running 5 | 05:38 | 39:04 | 05:29 +00:09 | 37:28 +01:36 |
| Rowing | 04:29 | 44:42 | 04:47 -00:18 | 42:57 +01:45 |
| Running 6 | 05:25 | 49:11 | 05:20 +00:05 | 47:44 +01:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:01 | 54:36 | 02:08 -00:07 | 53:04 +01:32 |
| Running 7 | 05:18 | 56:37 | 05:19 -00:01 | 55:12 +01:25 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:02 | 01:01:55 | 05:00 -00:58 | 01:00:31 +01:24 |
| Running 8 | 05:59 | 01:05:57 | 05:55 +00:04 | 01:05:31 +00:26 |
| Wall Balls | 05:20 | 01:11:56 | 06:20 -01:00 | 01:11:26 +00:30 |
| Roxzone | 07:20 | 01:24:28 | 06:42 +00:38 | 01:24:28 |
Tom Griffon, competing in the HYROX category, with an age group of 16-24, and nationality of France, has demonstrated a commendable performance. Overall, Tom ranks in the top 45% of 1579 athletes, and in his age group, he is in the top 58% of 123 athletes. His overall time in the race was 01:24:28. Despite his total running time being slightly slower than average, Tom has shown a strong running profile.
His consistent performance in running segments, such as running 1, 3, 4, and 7, where his time was faster than average, indicates his strong pacing strategy. He started the race with a faster pace in running 1, maintained it till running 4, and ended with a slightly faster pace in running 7. However, his slower performance in Running 2 and Roxzone suggests a need to improve his transition time and overall fitness.
In future races, Tom should consider implementing the following strategies for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Green Andy | 2023 London | 01:24:08 | |
| Adolphs Eric | 2024 Marseille | 01:24:04 | |
| Erlings Reiner | 2024 Dubai | 01:24:20 | |
| Campoy Luis | 2024 Madrid | 01:24:29 | |
| Siegert Daniel | 2022 Berlin | 01:24:08 | |
| Cox Daniel | 2024 Malaga | 01:24:35 | |
| Smart Calum | 2022 Manchester | 01:24:18 | |
| Tanzarella Luca | 2024 Milan | 01:24:52 | |
| Howard Ryan | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:24:01 | |
| Worthington Matthew | 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:02 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Griffon Tom
