Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 562 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Wearing Kylie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Wearing Kylie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Wearing Kylie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Wearing Kylie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:40. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:12 | 11:09 to 07:57 | 56.5% |
| Run Total | 01:31 | 54:44 to 53:13 | 26.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:37 | 07:38 to 07:01 | 10.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:20 | 03:38 to 03:18 | 5.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:57 to 04:57 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:37 to 05:37 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:29 to 02:29 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:30 to 05:30 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Wearing Kylie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:58 | 00:00 | 05:47 -01:49 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:57 | 03:58 | 05:27 -00:30 | 05:47 -01:49 |
| Running 2 | 06:12 | 08:55 | 06:23 -00:11 | 11:14 -02:19 |
| Sled Push | 03:38 | 15:07 | 03:16 +00:22 | 17:37 -02:30 |
| Running 3 | 06:45 | 18:45 | 06:45 +00:00 | 20:53 -02:08 |
| Sled Pull | 07:38 | 25:30 | 06:58 +00:40 | 27:38 -02:08 |
| Running 4 | 07:17 | 33:08 | 06:50 +00:27 | 34:36 -01:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 11:09 | 40:25 | 08:12 +02:57 | 41:26 -01:01 |
| Running 5 | 07:38 | 51:34 | 07:06 +00:32 | 49:38 +01:56 |
| Rowing | 05:37 | 59:12 | 05:48 -00:11 | 56:44 +02:28 |
| Running 6 | 07:23 | 01:04:49 | 06:59 +00:24 | 01:02:32 +02:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:29 | 01:12:12 | 02:38 -00:09 | 01:09:31 +02:41 |
| Running 7 | 07:27 | 01:14:41 | 06:57 +00:30 | 01:12:09 +02:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:30 | 01:22:08 | 06:07 -00:37 | 01:19:06 +03:02 |
| Running 8 | 08:08 | 01:27:38 | 07:48 +00:20 | 01:25:13 +02:25 |
| Wall Balls | 04:46 | 01:35:46 | 06:32 -01:46 | 01:33:01 +02:45 |
| Roxzone | 08:17 | 01:48:40 | 09:07 -00:50 | 01:48:40 |
Kylie Wearing delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox event, ranking in the top 37% overall and top 35% within her age group. Her running ability stands out with a total running time of 54:44, which is 52 seconds faster than the average, clearly indicating she possesses a strong runner profile. The initial running segments show that Kylie began the race with a strong pace, especially in Running 1, where she was significantly faster than average. However, her performance in strength-based exercises, particularly the Burpees Broad Jump, suggests room for improvement in strength endurance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bartels Alexandra | 2022 Bremen | 01:48:16 | |
| Horst Annelie | 2022 Bremen | 01:49:05 | |
| Steele Claire | 2024 Madrid | 01:48:43 | |
| Metens Sarah | 2024 Madrid | 01:48:24 | |
| Baek Sora | 2024 Singapore | 01:48:16 | |
| Greig Amanda | 2024 Melbourne | 01:48:53 | |
| Chin Sarah | 2024 Cape Town | 01:48:59 | |
| Smit Makena | 2024 Perth | 01:48:27 | |
| Evans Mandy | 2024 London | 01:48:50 | |
| Bause Nicola | 2018 Hamburg | 01:48:44 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
