Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Oberhausen using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Thul Lars's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Thul Lars's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Thul Lars's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Thul Lars's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:57. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:15 | 43:34 to 41:19 | 57.0% |
| Wall Balls | 01:27 | 07:25 to 05:58 | 36.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 04:33 to 04:22 | 4.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:04 | 04:59 to 04:55 | 1.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:51 to 01:51 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Thul Lars | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:25 | 00:00 | 04:35 -00:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:33 | 04:25 | 04:25 +00:08 | 04:35 -00:10 |
| Running 2 | 05:09 | 08:58 | 04:54 +00:15 | 09:00 -00:02 |
| Sled Push | 02:15 | 14:07 | 02:51 -00:36 | 13:54 +00:13 |
| Running 3 | 06:31 | 16:22 | 05:21 +01:10 | 16:45 -00:23 |
| Sled Pull | 04:15 | 22:53 | 04:50 -00:35 | 22:06 +00:47 |
| Running 4 | 05:38 | 27:08 | 05:20 +00:18 | 26:56 +00:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:59 | 32:46 | 05:13 -00:14 | 32:16 +00:30 |
| Running 5 | 05:38 | 37:45 | 05:30 +00:08 | 37:29 +00:16 |
| Rowing | 04:41 | 43:23 | 04:47 -00:06 | 42:59 +00:24 |
| Running 6 | 05:35 | 48:04 | 05:21 +00:14 | 47:46 +00:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:51 | 53:39 | 02:08 -00:17 | 53:07 +00:32 |
| Running 7 | 05:25 | 55:30 | 05:20 +00:05 | 55:15 +00:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:44 | 01:00:55 | 05:00 -00:16 | 01:00:35 +00:20 |
| Running 8 | 05:15 | 01:05:39 | 05:56 -00:41 | 01:05:35 +00:04 |
| Wall Balls | 07:25 | 01:10:54 | 06:22 +01:03 | 01:11:31 -00:37 |
| Roxzone | 06:20 | 01:24:34 | 06:41 -00:21 | 01:24:34 |
Based on his splits analysis, Lars had a slightly slower than average total running time of 00:43:34. This suggests that he could benefit from focusing more on his running training. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:04:25 indicates that he has the potential to excel in this area.
Overall, Lars Thul performed well in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his performance. By focusing on specific segments for improvement, implementing the suggested training strategies, and incorporating race strategies during the race, Lars can continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Montes Valentin | 2024 Madrid | 01:24:25 | |
| Keskinen Darren | 2024 Melbourne | 01:24:40 | |
| Crane Brian David | 2024 Paris | 01:24:12 | |
| Godfrey Niall | 2023 Dublin | 01:24:46 | |
| Westphal Florens | 2023 Hamburg | 01:24:10 | |
| Simmonds Blake | 2023 Birmingham | 01:24:26 | |
| Martinez Rubio Miguel Ángel | 2022 Valencia | 01:24:22 | |
| Catenacci Jeffrey | 2024 New York | 01:24:55 | |
| Skiba Maciej | 2024 Poznan | 01:24:59 | |
| Wright Broc | 2024 Brisbane | 01:24:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2019 Essen | 01:20:58 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:16:52 | |
| 2024 Frankfurt | 01:21:26 | |
| 2023 Frankfurt | 01:35:11 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
