Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 616 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Grzesiowski Mary Kate's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Grzesiowski Mary Kate's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Grzesiowski Mary Kate's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Grzesiowski Mary Kate's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 11:05. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:42 | 10:04 to 06:22 | 33.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:00 | 10:47 to 07:47 | 27.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:55 | 07:47 to 05:52 | 17.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:57 | 07:50 to 06:53 | 8.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:52 | 04:06 to 03:14 | 7.8% |
| Rowing | 00:30 | 06:15 to 05:45 | 4.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 02:45 to 02:36 | 1.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:13 to 05:13 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 47:02 to 47:02 | 0.0% |
| Grzesiowski Mary Kate | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:41 | 00:00 | 05:45 -02:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:13 | 03:41 | 05:27 -00:14 | 05:45 -02:04 |
| Running 2 | 06:10 | 08:54 | 06:18 -00:08 | 11:12 -02:18 |
| Sled Push | 04:06 | 15:04 | 03:15 +00:51 | 17:30 -02:26 |
| Running 3 | 06:29 | 19:10 | 06:41 -00:12 | 20:45 -01:35 |
| Sled Pull | 07:50 | 25:39 | 07:05 +00:45 | 27:26 -01:47 |
| Running 4 | 06:22 | 33:29 | 06:42 -00:20 | 34:31 -01:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:47 | 39:51 | 08:00 +02:47 | 41:13 -01:22 |
| Running 5 | 06:51 | 50:38 | 06:56 -00:05 | 49:13 +01:25 |
| Rowing | 06:15 | 57:29 | 05:47 +00:28 | 56:09 +01:20 |
| Running 6 | 06:29 | 01:03:44 | 06:48 -00:19 | 01:01:56 +01:48 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:45 | 01:10:13 | 02:39 +00:06 | 01:08:44 +01:29 |
| Running 7 | 06:26 | 01:12:58 | 06:47 -00:21 | 01:11:23 +01:35 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:47 | 01:19:24 | 06:02 +01:45 | 01:18:10 +01:14 |
| Running 8 | 04:36 | 01:27:11 | 07:36 -03:00 | 01:24:12 +02:59 |
| Wall Balls | 10:04 | 01:31:47 | 06:33 +03:31 | 01:31:48 -00:01 |
| Roxzone | 05:16 | 01:46:59 | 08:38 -03:22 | 01:46:59 |
Mary Kate Grzesiowski delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Dublin Hyrox Race. She finished in the top 26% of all athletes and in the top 25% of her age group. Her total running time was impressive, finishing 06:37 faster than the average. This suggests that running is her strong suit. A standout performance is her last running segment, where she showcased her endurance and speed by finishing 03:00 faster than the average. She also had a strong start with the first running segment, finishing 02:01 faster than the average. Her time spent in the roxzone was notably efficient, finishing 03:17 faster than the average. However, her performance in strength-based segments indicates room for improvement.
Considering Mary's strengths and areas of improvement, a few race strategies can be suggested.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mcgrath Treasa | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:47:05 | |
| Spiteri Dorothy | 2024 Poznan | 01:46:30 | |
| Mazzarella Sara | 2024 Milan | 01:47:12 | |
| Lovelace Gabriel | 2024 New York | 01:47:03 | |
| Overesch Lynn | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:46:34 | |
| Patel Ishani | 2023 London | 01:47:02 | |
| Corp Georgia | 2024 Dublin | 01:46:31 | |
| Van Der Laan Pelupessy Efisia | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:46:53 | |
| Oostinga Jolanda | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:47:12 | |
| Guillen Solis Carolina | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:47:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
