Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 855 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gohil Alpesh's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gohil Alpesh's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gohil Alpesh's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gohil Alpesh's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:41. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:13 | 10:24 to 07:11 | 48.1% |
| Wall Balls | 01:32 | 10:13 to 08:41 | 22.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:44 | 04:26 to 03:42 | 11.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:36 | 07:13 to 06:37 | 9.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:25 | 03:09 to 02:44 | 6.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:06 | 06:25 to 06:19 | 1.5% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 05:19 to 05:16 | 0.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:50 to 04:48 | 0.5% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 44:27 to 44:27 | 0.0% |
| Gohil Alpesh | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:44 | 00:00 | 05:22 +00:22 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:50 | 05:44 | 04:46 +00:04 | 05:22 +00:22 |
| Running 2 | 05:02 | 10:34 | 05:55 -00:53 | 10:08 +00:26 |
| Sled Push | 04:26 | 15:36 | 03:39 +00:47 | 16:03 -00:27 |
| Running 3 | 04:56 | 20:02 | 06:35 -01:39 | 19:42 +00:20 |
| Sled Pull | 06:25 | 24:58 | 06:25 +00:00 | 26:17 -01:19 |
| Running 4 | 05:22 | 31:23 | 06:33 -01:11 | 32:42 -01:19 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:24 | 36:45 | 07:24 +03:00 | 39:15 -02:30 |
| Running 5 | 05:48 | 47:09 | 06:50 -01:02 | 46:39 +00:30 |
| Rowing | 05:19 | 52:57 | 05:17 +00:02 | 53:29 -00:32 |
| Running 6 | 05:16 | 58:16 | 06:38 -01:22 | 58:46 -00:30 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:09 | 01:03:32 | 02:40 +00:29 | 01:05:24 -01:52 |
| Running 7 | 05:54 | 01:06:41 | 06:37 -00:43 | 01:08:04 -01:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:13 | 01:12:35 | 06:51 +00:22 | 01:14:41 -02:06 |
| Running 8 | 06:29 | 01:19:48 | 08:04 -01:35 | 01:21:32 -01:44 |
| Wall Balls | 10:13 | 01:26:17 | 08:51 +01:22 | 01:29:36 -03:19 |
| Roxzone | 11:48 | 01:48:11 | 09:44 +02:04 | 01:48:11 |
Alpesh Gohil, in the 40-44 age group, delivered a robust performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race. With an overall rank of 2444, placing in the top 59% of 4107 athletes, his performance was commendable. He managed to perform exceptionally well in the running segments, finishing with a total running time of 00:44:27, which is 08:15 faster than the average. This indicates that Alpesh has a strong runner profile. However, his pacing strategy needs to be addressed. Alpesh started slower in the initial segments like Running 1 and Ski Erg, but gained momentum from Running 2 onwards. This strategy, while effective in the short term, could lead to early fatigue in longer races.
Based on Alpesh's performance, a few strategies can be implemented for better performance in future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Thompson Leon | 2023 Malaga | 01:48:34 | |
| Miller Josh | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:48:07 | |
| Ruijter Tom | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:48:19 | |
| De Rooy Roel | 2024 Katowice | 01:48:04 | |
| Greenhouse Anthony | 2024 Birmingham | 01:48:22 | |
| Podolski Zenon | 2024 Poznan | 01:47:42 | |
| Lott Alan | 2023 London | 01:47:57 | |
| Shearer Ewan | 2024 Glasgow | 01:48:17 | |
| Roache Nigel | 2022 London | 01:47:42 | |
| Tosto Giancarlo | 2023 München | 01:48:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:44:14 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
