Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Chicago using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Edwards Clay's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Edwards Clay hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Edwards Clay’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Edwards Clay's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:16 | 05:43 to 04:27 | 35.2% |
| Run Total | 00:58 | 40:13 to 39:15 | 26.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:48 | 06:15 to 05:27 | 22.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:27 | 04:51 to 04:24 | 12.5% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:39 to 04:35 | 1.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:03 | 04:16 to 04:13 | 1.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:07 to 02:07 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:49 to 01:49 | 0.0% |
| Edwards Clay | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:45 | 00:00 | 04:23 -00:38 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:12 | 03:45 | 04:21 -00:09 | 04:23 -00:38 |
| Running 2 | 04:55 | 07:57 | 04:44 +00:11 | 08:44 -00:47 |
| Sled Push | 02:07 | 12:52 | 02:44 -00:37 | 13:28 -00:36 |
| Running 3 | 05:10 | 14:59 | 05:07 +00:03 | 16:12 -01:13 |
| Sled Pull | 04:16 | 20:09 | 04:35 -00:19 | 21:19 -01:10 |
| Running 4 | 05:07 | 24:25 | 05:06 +00:01 | 25:54 -01:29 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:43 | 29:32 | 04:54 +00:49 | 31:00 -01:28 |
| Running 5 | 05:20 | 35:15 | 05:15 +00:05 | 35:54 -00:39 |
| Rowing | 04:39 | 40:35 | 04:41 -00:02 | 41:09 -00:34 |
| Running 6 | 05:13 | 45:14 | 05:08 +00:05 | 45:50 -00:36 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:49 | 50:27 | 02:04 -00:15 | 50:58 -00:31 |
| Running 7 | 05:17 | 52:16 | 05:06 +00:11 | 53:02 -00:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:51 | 57:33 | 04:44 +00:07 | 58:08 -00:35 |
| Running 8 | 05:29 | 01:02:24 | 05:35 -00:06 | 01:02:52 -00:28 |
| Wall Balls | 06:15 | 01:07:53 | 05:57 +00:18 | 01:08:27 -00:34 |
| Roxzone | 06:34 | 01:20:34 | 06:10 +00:24 | 01:20:34 |
In terms of his running performance, Clay's total running time of 00:40:13 was 01:09 slower than the average for his finish time. This suggests that he may benefit from improving his overall fitness and transition time. It is noteworthy that Clay performed exceptionally well in the first running segment, completing it in 00:03:45, which was 00:31 faster than the average. This indicates that he possesses good running capabilities and may have a runner profile.
In conclusion, Clay Edwards had a commendable performance in the 2023 Chicago Hyrox race. To further enhance his performance, he should focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time. By addressing the specific areas of improvement highlighted in the splits analysis and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, Clay can continue to progress and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Knox Daniel | 2024 Birmingham | 01:20:44 | |
| Eekhof Hans | 2024 Maastricht | 01:20:57 | |
| Entwistle Dan | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:21:03 | |
| Spenger Philipp | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:20:14 | |
| Sheridan Paul | 2024 Glasgow | 01:20:32 | |
| Taylor Nathan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:20:31 | |
| Frost Rob | 2023 London | 01:20:10 | |
| Carleton Matthew | 2024 Dublin | 01:20:50 | |
| Augat Uwe | 2024 Hamburg | 01:20:32 | |
| Smith Aaron | 2023 London | 01:20:47 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
