Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Whitmore Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Whitmore Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Whitmore Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Whitmore Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:12. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:40 | 08:35 to 04:55 | 44.7% |
| Sled Push | 01:07 | 03:20 to 02:13 | 13.6% |
| Sled Pull | 01:07 | 04:57 to 03:50 | 13.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:07 | 05:03 to 03:56 | 13.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:32 | 04:31 to 03:59 | 6.5% |
| Rowing | 00:27 | 04:54 to 04:27 | 5.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:12 | 01:55 to 01:43 | 2.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 33:30 to 33:30 | 0.0% |
| Whitmore Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:24 | 00:00 | 04:14 -00:50 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:02 | 03:24 | 04:17 -00:15 | 04:14 -00:50 |
| Running 2 | 04:00 | 07:26 | 04:30 -00:30 | 08:31 -01:05 |
| Sled Push | 03:20 | 11:26 | 02:35 +00:45 | 13:01 -01:35 |
| Running 3 | 04:13 | 14:46 | 04:51 -00:38 | 15:36 -00:50 |
| Sled Pull | 04:57 | 18:59 | 04:17 +00:40 | 20:27 -01:28 |
| Running 4 | 04:17 | 23:56 | 04:50 -00:33 | 24:44 -00:48 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:03 | 28:13 | 04:26 +00:37 | 29:34 -01:21 |
| Running 5 | 04:15 | 33:16 | 04:57 -00:42 | 34:00 -00:44 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 37:31 | 04:35 +00:19 | 38:57 -01:26 |
| Running 6 | 04:18 | 42:25 | 04:52 -00:34 | 43:32 -01:07 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:55 | 46:43 | 01:56 -00:01 | 48:24 -01:41 |
| Running 7 | 04:20 | 48:38 | 04:50 -00:30 | 50:20 -01:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:31 | 52:58 | 04:24 +00:07 | 55:10 -02:12 |
| Running 8 | 04:46 | 57:29 | 05:13 -00:27 | 59:34 -02:05 |
| Wall Balls | 08:35 | 01:02:15 | 05:30 +03:05 | 01:04:47 -02:32 |
| Roxzone | 05:08 | 01:15:52 | 05:35 -00:27 | 01:15:52 |
Mark Whitmore showed an impressive performance in the 2024 Paris HYROX Race. Notably, his overall rank is 230 out of 386 athletes, placing him in the top 59%. Mark's performance was even more commendable within his age group (40-44), where he secured the 33rd position, ranking in the top 54% of 61 athletes.
Mark's total running time of 00:33:30 was exceptional, being 04:57 faster than the average, which indicates that he has a strong runner's profile. His best running lap was completed in 00:04:00, a testament to his speed and endurance. Regarding his pacing, Mark showed a tendency to start faster than average in the initial segments, pointing to a high level of initial energy and a robust start.
Mark should consider the following strategies for improved performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Velazquez Alvarez Rafa | 2024 Bilbao | 01:15:40 | |
| Lacassagne Lucas | 2024 Marseille | 01:15:40 | |
| Smith James | 2023 London | 01:16:08 | |
| Hendrie Charlie | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:15:51 | |
| Heim Benedikt | 2019 Nürnberg | 01:15:23 | |
| Vicente Martin Alvaro | 2023 Madrid | 01:15:40 | |
| Gamlien Brian | 2024 Marseille | 01:16:16 | |
| De Rooij Martijn | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:16:07 | |
| Rombout Dave | 2024 Maastricht | 01:15:32 | |
| Irwin George | 2023 London | 01:15:30 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Stockholm | 01:09:07 | |
| 2024 London | 01:22:56 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:10:33 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:18:21 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:28:11 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
