Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Glasgow using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 707 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Thomson Rebecca's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Thomson Rebecca's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Thomson Rebecca's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Thomson Rebecca's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:34. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:59 | 07:59 to 06:00 | 43.4% |
| Run Total | 01:18 | 52:34 to 51:16 | 28.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:36 | 03:06 to 02:30 | 13.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:17 | 03:24 to 03:07 | 6.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 05:34 to 05:22 | 4.4% |
| Rowing | 00:12 | 05:52 to 05:40 | 4.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:49 to 05:49 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:14 to 07:14 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:23 to 05:23 | 0.0% |
| Thomson Rebecca | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:56 | 00:00 | 05:37 +00:19 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:34 | 05:56 | 05:23 +00:11 | 05:37 +00:19 |
| Running 2 | 05:59 | 11:30 | 06:10 -00:11 | 11:00 +00:30 |
| Sled Push | 03:24 | 17:29 | 03:06 +00:18 | 17:10 +00:19 |
| Running 3 | 06:22 | 20:53 | 06:32 -00:10 | 20:16 +00:37 |
| Sled Pull | 05:49 | 27:15 | 06:43 -00:54 | 26:48 +00:27 |
| Running 4 | 06:26 | 33:04 | 06:35 -00:09 | 33:31 -00:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:14 | 39:30 | 07:41 -00:27 | 40:06 -00:36 |
| Running 5 | 06:48 | 46:44 | 06:46 +00:02 | 47:47 -01:03 |
| Rowing | 05:52 | 53:32 | 05:42 +00:10 | 54:33 -01:01 |
| Running 6 | 06:42 | 59:24 | 06:39 +00:03 | 01:00:15 -00:51 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:06 | 01:06:06 | 02:32 +00:34 | 01:06:54 -00:48 |
| Running 7 | 06:49 | 01:09:12 | 06:38 +00:11 | 01:09:26 -00:14 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:23 | 01:16:01 | 05:47 -00:24 | 01:16:04 -00:03 |
| Running 8 | 07:35 | 01:21:24 | 07:27 +00:08 | 01:21:51 -00:27 |
| Wall Balls | 07:59 | 01:28:59 | 06:07 +01:52 | 01:29:18 -00:19 |
| Roxzone | 07:05 | 01:43:56 | 08:31 -01:26 | 01:43:56 |
Rebecca Thomson's performance in the 2024 Glasgow HYROX race places her in the top 22% of all athletes and top 24% in her age group, which is commendable. Notably, her total running time was 30 seconds faster than average, indicating a stronger inclination towards running. Despite this, her initial running segment was slower, suggesting a cautious start. Rebecca demonstrates a hybrid profile with a slight lean towards running, but there is room for improvement in her strength segments to achieve a more balanced performance. Her Roxzone time was significantly faster than average, indicating efficient transitions, yet this also suggests that further improvements in overall fitness could reduce the need for rest between segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Keyes Menna | 2024 Stockholm | 01:44:01 | |
| Robertson Amy | 2023 Glasgow | 01:44:06 | |
| De Vries Samantha | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:44:19 | |
| Prossegger Kathrin | 2018 Wien | 01:43:50 | |
| Van Gelderen Romy | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:43:32 | |
| Ghergo Rebecca | 2024 Turin | 01:43:27 | |
| Adamek Malwina | 2023 Köln | 01:44:24 | |
| Bruno Marina | 2023 Milan | 01:43:49 | |
| Hadler Anke | 2023 Hamburg | 01:43:51 | |
| Goddard Sirkku | 2024 London | 01:44:13 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
