Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Tebb Matthew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Tebb Matthew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Tebb Matthew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Tebb Matthew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:56. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:57 | 05:59 to 05:02 | 19.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:55 | 07:01 to 06:06 | 18.6% |
| Run Total | 00:43 | 42:32 to 41:49 | 14.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:42 | 05:22 to 04:40 | 14.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:33 | 05:25 to 04:52 | 11.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:29 | 02:32 to 02:03 | 9.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:26 | 04:49 to 04:23 | 8.8% |
| Rowing | 00:11 | 04:55 to 04:44 | 3.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:40 to 02:40 | 0.0% |
| Tebb Matthew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:19 | 00:00 | 04:39 +00:40 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:49 | 05:19 | 04:27 +00:22 | 04:39 +00:40 |
| Running 2 | 05:18 | 10:08 | 04:58 +00:20 | 09:06 +01:02 |
| Sled Push | 02:40 | 15:26 | 02:56 -00:16 | 14:04 +01:22 |
| Running 3 | 05:38 | 18:06 | 05:25 +00:13 | 17:00 +01:06 |
| Sled Pull | 05:22 | 23:44 | 05:00 +00:22 | 22:25 +01:19 |
| Running 4 | 05:11 | 29:06 | 05:24 -00:13 | 27:25 +01:41 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:59 | 34:17 | 05:20 +00:39 | 32:49 +01:28 |
| Running 5 | 05:23 | 40:16 | 05:34 -00:11 | 38:09 +02:07 |
| Rowing | 04:55 | 45:39 | 04:49 +00:06 | 43:43 +01:56 |
| Running 6 | 05:07 | 50:34 | 05:27 -00:20 | 48:32 +02:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:32 | 55:41 | 02:12 +00:20 | 53:59 +01:42 |
| Running 7 | 05:12 | 58:13 | 05:24 -00:12 | 56:11 +02:02 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:25 | 01:03:25 | 05:06 +00:19 | 01:01:35 +01:50 |
| Running 8 | 05:27 | 01:08:50 | 06:03 -00:36 | 01:06:41 +02:09 |
| Wall Balls | 07:01 | 01:14:17 | 06:33 +00:28 | 01:12:44 +01:33 |
| Roxzone | 05:03 | 01:26:14 | 06:57 -01:54 | 01:26:14 |
Analyzing his splits, it is evident that Matthew struggled in certain segments compared to the average finish time. His total running time of 00:42:32 was 01:02 slower than the average, indicating that he may need to work on his running fitness. Additionally, his best running lap of 00:05:07 was slower than the average, suggesting room for improvement in this area.
He should aim to start strong but avoid going out too fast in the initial running segments. By pacing himself appropriately, he can ensure that he has enough energy for the more challenging segments later in the race.
Additionally, Matthew should pay attention to his transition time in the roxzone. By improving his overall fitness and reducing transition time, he can gain an advantage over his competitors.
Incorporating interval training, strength exercises, and specific drills into his training routine will be crucial for Matthew to enhance his performance and achieve better results in future HYROX races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Swift Richard | 2023 Glasgow | 01:26:06 | |
| Schwendtke Jonathan | 2022 Hamburg | 01:25:59 | |
| Chen Vince | 2024 London | 01:26:24 | |
| Beckler Julian | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:26:38 | |
| Davidson Christopher | 2024 London | 01:25:57 | |
| Hayes Richard | 2023 Birmingham | 01:26:44 | |
| Einarsson Magnus | 2024 Malaga | 01:26:25 | |
| Haley Daniel | 2024 Birmingham | 01:25:51 | |
| Doolan Alan | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:26:34 | |
| Brown Adam | 2024 Manchester | 01:25:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Dublin | 01:17:30 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
