Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Talaepa Michael's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Talaepa Michael's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Talaepa Michael's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Talaepa Michael's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:00. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:31 | 52:11 to 45:40 | 93.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:29 | 06:04 to 05:35 | 6.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:29 to 02:29 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:52 to 03:52 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:31 to 01:31 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:00 to 06:00 | 0.0% |
| Talaepa Michael | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:07 | 00:00 | 04:59 +00:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:16 | 05:07 | 04:35 -00:19 | 04:59 +00:08 |
| Running 2 | 07:37 | 09:23 | 05:23 +02:14 | 09:34 -00:11 |
| Sled Push | 02:29 | 17:00 | 03:12 -00:43 | 14:57 +02:03 |
| Running 3 | 05:04 | 19:29 | 05:53 -00:49 | 18:09 +01:20 |
| Sled Pull | 03:52 | 24:33 | 05:30 -01:38 | 24:02 +00:31 |
| Running 4 | 05:33 | 28:25 | 05:52 -00:19 | 29:32 -01:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:59 | 33:58 | 06:11 -01:12 | 35:24 -01:26 |
| Running 5 | 07:06 | 38:57 | 06:05 +01:01 | 41:35 -02:38 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 46:03 | 05:02 -00:15 | 47:40 -01:37 |
| Running 6 | 06:24 | 50:50 | 05:54 +00:30 | 52:42 -01:52 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:31 | 57:14 | 02:24 -00:53 | 58:36 -01:22 |
| Running 7 | 06:36 | 58:45 | 05:53 +00:43 | 01:01:00 -02:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:04 | 01:05:21 | 05:49 +00:15 | 01:06:53 -01:32 |
| Running 8 | 08:47 | 01:11:25 | 06:46 +02:01 | 01:12:42 -01:17 |
| Wall Balls | 06:00 | 01:20:12 | 07:28 -01:28 | 01:19:28 +00:44 |
| Roxzone | 08:54 | 01:34:59 | 08:03 +00:51 | 01:34:59 |
Michael Talaepa delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, ranking in the top 44% both overall and within his age group. His overall time of 01:34:59 showcases strong capabilities, particularly in strength-oriented segments. However, his total running time was 05:02 slower than average, indicating a need for improvement in running efficiency. Notably, his best running lap was 00:05:04, showing potential for better pacing. Analyzing the initial running segments, Michael started at a moderate pace, with varying performance across the segments, suggesting an opportunity to refine pacing strategy. Overall, Michael demonstrates a hybrid profile with strengths in strength-based exercises but requires enhancement in running and transition efficiency.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Owen Daniel | 2023 London | 01:35:01 | |
| Barrios Gustavo | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:35:25 | |
| Van Der Linden Martin | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:34:29 | |
| Van De Grift Mark | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:34:47 | |
| Briggs Daniel | 2024 Melbourne | 01:34:49 | |
| Cahill Ray | 2024 Berlin | 01:34:53 | |
| Brooks Jeremy | 2024 New York | 01:35:22 | |
| Jackson Mark | 2023 Manchester | 01:34:33 | |
| Manshanden Job | 2024 Maastricht | 01:34:46 | |
| Nguyen Minh Hoang | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:34:56 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
