Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Serrano Nico's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Serrano Nico's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Serrano Nico's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Serrano Nico's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:09. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:11 | 06:09 to 04:58 | 37.6% |
| Run Total | 00:50 | 42:19 to 41:29 | 26.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:34 | 03:15 to 02:41 | 18.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:26 | 05:14 to 04:48 | 13.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:08 | 04:44 to 04:36 | 4.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:03 to 04:03 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:20 to 05:20 | 0.0% |
| Serrano Nico | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:33 | 00:00 | 04:36 +00:57 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:03 | 05:33 | 04:26 -00:23 | 04:36 +00:57 |
| Running 2 | 04:45 | 09:36 | 04:56 -00:11 | 09:02 +00:34 |
| Sled Push | 03:15 | 14:21 | 02:53 +00:22 | 13:58 +00:23 |
| Running 3 | 05:13 | 17:36 | 05:22 -00:09 | 16:51 +00:45 |
| Sled Pull | 04:44 | 22:49 | 04:55 -00:11 | 22:13 +00:36 |
| Running 4 | 05:07 | 27:33 | 05:20 -00:13 | 27:08 +00:25 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:09 | 32:40 | 05:18 +00:51 | 32:28 +00:12 |
| Running 5 | 05:34 | 38:49 | 05:31 +00:03 | 37:46 +01:03 |
| Rowing | 04:34 | 44:23 | 04:49 -00:15 | 43:17 +01:06 |
| Running 6 | 05:09 | 48:57 | 05:22 -00:13 | 48:06 +00:51 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 54:06 | 02:11 -00:13 | 53:28 +00:38 |
| Running 7 | 05:19 | 56:04 | 05:21 -00:02 | 55:39 +00:25 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:14 | 01:01:23 | 05:05 +00:09 | 01:01:00 +00:23 |
| Running 8 | 05:43 | 01:06:37 | 05:58 -00:15 | 01:06:05 +00:32 |
| Wall Balls | 05:20 | 01:12:20 | 06:29 -01:09 | 01:12:03 +00:17 |
| Roxzone | 07:51 | 01:25:22 | 06:50 +01:01 | 01:25:22 |
Nico Serrano demonstrated a commendable performance with an overall ranking in the top 32% of all athletes and 38% in his age group. His total running time was faster than average, indicating a stronger runner profile. However, there were segments where his performance was slower than average, which suggests areas for improvement. His performance in the first four running segments indicates that he started slower than average but gradually improved his timing.
Nico should consider pacing himself better at the start of the race to conserve energy for later segments. Although his total running time is faster than average, he starts slower in the initial running segments. He should aim for a consistent pace throughout all running segments.
Given his strength in running, Nico should also capitalize on these segments to gain time. However, he should also be mindful not to exhaust himself in these segments, as it can affect his performance in strength-based segments.
Lastly, Nico should focus on improving his transition times between exercises. Efficient transitions can greatly reduce his overall time and improve his ranking.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Scordo Brice | 2024 Marseille | 01:25:16 | |
| Pfeiffer Florian | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:25:20 | |
| Kling Bram | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:24:54 | |
| Heavin Jacob | 2022 Dallas | 01:25:34 | |
| Hammond Sean | 2022 Manchester | 01:25:51 | |
| Fuhrholz Ralph | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:25:00 | |
| Roth Eric | 2023 München | 01:25:11 | |
| Held Andreas | 2022 Bremen | 01:25:32 | |
| Ouston Jason | 2022 London | 01:24:58 | |
| Ong Alexander | 2022 London | 01:25:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
