Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Radford Matthew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Radford Matthew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Radford Matthew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Radford Matthew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:42. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:12 | 08:20 to 06:08 | 46.8% |
| Run Total | 00:51 | 42:50 to 41:59 | 18.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:28 | 05:10 to 04:42 | 9.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:24 | 05:17 to 04:53 | 8.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:20 | 05:25 to 05:05 | 7.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:15 | 03:00 to 02:45 | 5.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:07 | 02:11 to 02:04 | 2.5% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 04:50 to 04:45 | 1.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Radford Matthew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:56 | 00:00 | 04:40 -00:44 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 03:56 | 04:28 -00:05 | 04:40 -00:44 |
| Running 2 | 05:07 | 08:19 | 05:00 +00:07 | 09:08 -00:49 |
| Sled Push | 03:00 | 13:26 | 02:56 +00:04 | 14:08 -00:42 |
| Running 3 | 05:24 | 16:26 | 05:26 -00:02 | 17:04 -00:38 |
| Sled Pull | 05:10 | 21:50 | 05:00 +00:10 | 22:30 -00:40 |
| Running 4 | 05:31 | 27:00 | 05:26 +00:05 | 27:30 -00:30 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:25 | 32:31 | 05:22 +00:03 | 32:56 -00:25 |
| Running 5 | 05:50 | 37:56 | 05:36 +00:14 | 38:18 -00:22 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 43:46 | 04:50 +00:00 | 43:54 -00:08 |
| Running 6 | 05:41 | 48:36 | 05:29 +00:12 | 48:44 -00:08 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:11 | 54:17 | 02:12 -00:01 | 54:13 +00:04 |
| Running 7 | 05:31 | 56:28 | 05:26 +00:05 | 56:25 +00:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:17 | 01:01:59 | 05:09 +00:08 | 01:01:51 +00:08 |
| Running 8 | 05:54 | 01:07:16 | 06:04 -00:10 | 01:07:00 +00:16 |
| Wall Balls | 08:20 | 01:13:10 | 06:35 +01:45 | 01:13:04 +00:06 |
| Roxzone | 05:18 | 01:26:37 | 06:58 -01:40 | 01:26:37 |
Based on the splits analysis, Matthew excelled in the Running 1, Ski Erg, Sled Push, Running 3, Sled Pull, and Farmers Carry segments, consistently performing faster than the average. This indicates that he has a good level of strength and endurance, which contributed to his overall performance.
However, Matthew struggled in the Wall Balls, Burpees Broad Jump, Running 5, Sandbag Lunges, and Running 6 segments, losing significant time compared to the average. These are the areas that require attention and improvement to enhance his overall performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Shawyer Adam | 2024 Malaga | 01:27:03 | |
| Brumfit Ben | 2024 London | 01:26:23 | |
| Mather Andrew | 2024 Manchester | 01:26:28 | |
| Cairns Scott | 2024 Glasgow | 01:26:09 | |
| Lopez Maxime | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:26:13 | |
| Krone Brenner | 2024 New York | 01:27:07 | |
| Herrmann Rigo | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:27:06 | |
| King Ollie | 2024 Köln | 01:26:59 | |
| Alshamsi Salem | 2024 Dubai | 01:26:26 | |
| Bruni Christian | 2024 Milan | 01:26:59 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Warschau | 01:33:51 | |
| 2024 Manchester | 01:21:12 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:30:00 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
