Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcginty Glenn's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcginty Glenn's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcginty Glenn's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcginty Glenn's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:03. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:29 | 40:11 to 38:42 | 36.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:53 | 05:13 to 04:20 | 21.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:41 | 04:49 to 04:08 | 16.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:22 | 02:13 to 01:51 | 9.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:16 | 02:40 to 02:24 | 6.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:16 | 04:34 to 04:18 | 6.6% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 04:40 to 04:34 | 2.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:04 to 04:04 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:12 to 05:12 | 0.0% |
| Mcginty Glenn | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:36 | 00:00 | 04:20 -00:44 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:04 | 03:36 | 04:20 -00:16 | 04:20 -00:44 |
| Running 2 | 04:55 | 07:40 | 04:40 +00:15 | 08:40 -01:00 |
| Sled Push | 02:40 | 12:35 | 02:41 -00:01 | 13:20 -00:45 |
| Running 3 | 05:26 | 15:15 | 05:04 +00:22 | 16:01 -00:46 |
| Sled Pull | 04:49 | 20:41 | 04:29 +00:20 | 21:05 -00:24 |
| Running 4 | 05:10 | 25:30 | 05:03 +00:07 | 25:34 -00:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:13 | 30:40 | 04:46 +00:27 | 30:37 +00:03 |
| Running 5 | 05:18 | 35:53 | 05:11 +00:07 | 35:23 +00:30 |
| Rowing | 04:40 | 41:11 | 04:40 +00:00 | 40:34 +00:37 |
| Running 6 | 05:10 | 45:51 | 05:04 +00:06 | 45:14 +00:37 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:13 | 51:01 | 02:02 +00:11 | 50:18 +00:43 |
| Running 7 | 05:11 | 53:14 | 05:03 +00:08 | 52:20 +00:54 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:34 | 58:25 | 04:37 -00:03 | 57:23 +01:02 |
| Running 8 | 05:30 | 01:02:59 | 05:31 -00:01 | 01:02:00 +00:59 |
| Wall Balls | 05:12 | 01:08:29 | 05:50 -00:38 | 01:07:31 +00:58 |
| Roxzone | 05:49 | 01:19:21 | 06:00 -00:11 | 01:19:21 |
In terms of pacing, Glenn's running 1 segment was 37 seconds faster than average, suggesting that he started the race strong. However, he experienced a slowdown in running 2, running 3, and running 4 segments, which were all slower than average. This indicates that he may have pushed too hard at the beginning and fatigued later in the race.
Glenn's total running time of 00:40:11 was 01:32 slower than average. This suggests that he could benefit from focusing on improving his running performance.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating specific training techniques and exercises, Glenn can enhance his performance in the HYROX race and continue to improve his overall fitness.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Schulz Maik | 2022 Hamburg | 01:19:16 | |
| Lindeborg Thomas | 2023 Stockholm | 01:19:51 | |
| Devine Matthew | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:19:51 | |
| Klepanda Michał | 2024 Poznan | 01:19:44 | |
| Badiei Arash | 2024 Melbourne | 01:18:59 | |
| Abbatt Will | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:19:24 | |
| Procter David | 2024 Madrid | 01:19:12 | |
| Gasparato Thomas | 2024 Dubai | 01:19:06 | |
| González Soler David | 2023 Madrid | 01:19:24 | |
| Carminati Ivan | 2024 Rimini | 01:19:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:13:44 | |
| 2023 Glasgow | 01:27:57 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
