Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire James Nick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights James Nick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the James Nick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve James Nick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 01:23 | 03:45 to 02:22 | 26.7% |
| Wall Balls | 01:14 | 06:28 to 05:14 | 23.8% |
| Run Total | 00:47 | 39:05 to 38:18 | 15.1% |
| Rowing | 00:39 | 05:11 to 04:32 | 12.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:31 | 04:35 to 04:04 | 10.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:28 | 02:17 to 01:49 | 9.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:09 | 04:22 to 04:13 | 2.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| James Nick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:28 | 00:00 | 04:19 -00:51 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:22 | 03:28 | 04:20 +00:02 | 04:19 -00:51 |
| Running 2 | 04:55 | 07:50 | 04:38 +00:17 | 08:39 -00:49 |
| Sled Push | 03:45 | 12:45 | 02:40 +01:05 | 13:17 -00:32 |
| Running 3 | 05:05 | 16:30 | 05:01 +00:04 | 15:57 +00:33 |
| Sled Pull | 04:35 | 21:35 | 04:27 +00:08 | 20:58 +00:37 |
| Running 4 | 05:04 | 26:10 | 04:59 +00:05 | 25:25 +00:45 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:02 | 31:14 | 04:40 -00:38 | 30:24 +00:50 |
| Running 5 | 05:11 | 35:16 | 05:09 +00:02 | 35:04 +00:12 |
| Rowing | 05:11 | 40:27 | 04:39 +00:32 | 40:13 +00:14 |
| Running 6 | 04:59 | 45:38 | 05:02 -00:03 | 44:52 +00:46 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:17 | 50:37 | 02:01 +00:16 | 49:54 +00:43 |
| Running 7 | 05:02 | 52:54 | 05:01 +00:01 | 51:55 +00:59 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:05 | 57:56 | 04:35 -00:30 | 56:56 +01:00 |
| Running 8 | 05:25 | 01:02:01 | 05:27 -00:02 | 01:01:31 +00:30 |
| Wall Balls | 06:28 | 01:07:26 | 05:46 +00:42 | 01:06:58 +00:28 |
| Roxzone | 04:52 | 01:18:39 | 05:55 -01:03 | 01:18:39 |
Based on the splits analysis, Nick's strongest segment was the Burpees Broad Jump, where he was 19 seconds faster than the average time. His pacing throughout the race was generally consistent, with some segments being slightly faster or slower than the average time. His roxzone time was 48 seconds faster than average, indicating that he transitions efficiently between exercise zones.
Nick should also consider implementing specific race strategies for each segment. For example, in segments where he tends to lose time, he can focus on maintaining proper form and technique to minimize any potential loss. Additionally, he should prioritize efficient transitions between exercise zones to maximize his overall race time.
In conclusion, Nick James had a strong performance in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can improve to further enhance his performance. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, he can address the segments where he lost time and continue to improve his overall race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Abols Kevin | 2022 Birmingham | 01:18:10 | |
| Buschini Tom | 2023 Barcelona | 01:19:02 | |
| Balsgaard Lasse | 2023 Hamburg | 01:19:05 | |
| Dotrimont Dimitry | 2024 Paris | 01:18:09 | |
| Eschenbrenner Lionel | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:18:35 | |
| Kharin Dmitry | 2022 London | 01:18:12 | |
| Savolainen Aripekka | 2023 Singapore | 01:18:28 | |
| Dicorato Alessandro | 2023 Milan | 01:18:18 | |
| Jasiorski Tomasz | 2023 Warschau | 01:18:32 | |
| Böhm Kevin | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:18:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Manchester | 02:06:02 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
