Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Houston Scott's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Houston Scott's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Houston Scott's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Houston Scott's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:51 | 06:49 to 04:58 | 47.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:51 | 05:39 to 04:48 | 21.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:30 | 02:32 to 02:02 | 12.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:18 | 02:59 to 02:41 | 7.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:10 | 04:32 to 04:22 | 4.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:10 | 06:11 to 06:01 | 4.3% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:46 to 04:43 | 1.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:13 to 04:13 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:50 to 40:50 | 0.0% |
| Houston Scott | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:34 | 00:00 | 04:35 +00:59 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 05:34 | 04:26 +00:06 | 04:35 +00:59 |
| Running 2 | 04:44 | 10:06 | 04:56 -00:12 | 09:01 +01:05 |
| Sled Push | 02:59 | 14:50 | 02:52 +00:07 | 13:57 +00:53 |
| Running 3 | 04:57 | 17:49 | 05:23 -00:26 | 16:49 +01:00 |
| Sled Pull | 04:13 | 22:46 | 04:54 -00:41 | 22:12 +00:34 |
| Running 4 | 04:54 | 26:59 | 05:20 -00:26 | 27:06 -00:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:49 | 31:53 | 05:17 +01:32 | 32:26 -00:33 |
| Running 5 | 05:07 | 38:42 | 05:31 -00:24 | 37:43 +00:59 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 43:49 | 04:49 -00:03 | 43:14 +00:35 |
| Running 6 | 05:04 | 48:35 | 05:22 -00:18 | 48:03 +00:32 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:32 | 53:39 | 02:10 +00:22 | 53:25 +00:14 |
| Running 7 | 05:09 | 56:11 | 05:21 -00:12 | 55:35 +00:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:39 | 01:01:20 | 05:04 +00:35 | 01:00:56 +00:24 |
| Running 8 | 05:25 | 01:06:59 | 05:57 -00:32 | 01:06:00 +00:59 |
| Wall Balls | 06:11 | 01:12:24 | 06:29 -00:18 | 01:11:57 +00:27 |
| Roxzone | 06:47 | 01:25:14 | 06:48 -00:01 | 01:25:14 |
Scott Houston presented a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race. His overall rank places him in the top 41% of all participants, indicating his strong competitive edge. Notably, his total running time of 00:40:50 was 01:52 faster than the average, highlighting his exceptional running capabilities. However, he demonstrated a somewhat slower start in the first running segment, which was 01:00 slower than the average. Throughout the race, Scott managed to steadily improve his running times, allowing him to finish the race strongly with running times that consistently surpassed the average.
While Scott's running performance was impressive, his performance in some strength-based segments, such as the Burpees Broad Jump and the Sandbag Lunges, was slower than average. His Roxzone time was also slightly slower than average, indicating a need for improved transitions and rest management. Considering these observations, Scott appears to be more of a runner profile athlete.
Scott should consider implementing the following strategies to improve his overall performance in future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Dan | 2024 Sydney | 01:25:41 | |
| Gell Oliver | 2023 London | 01:24:52 | |
| Trublin Benjamin | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:25:12 | |
| Piper Brett | 2024 Perth | 01:25:03 | |
| Burgess Chris | 2024 Glasgow | 01:24:54 | |
| Bakun Oskar | 2023 Barcelona | 01:25:42 | |
| Kingsman James | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:25:15 | |
| Roloff Maik | 2023 Hamburg | 01:25:08 | |
| Van Der Woude Rudie | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:24:45 | |
| Eyre Josh | 2023 Birmingham | 01:25:03 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:30:18 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
