Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 762 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gibson Sarah's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gibson Sarah's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gibson Sarah's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gibson Sarah's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:06 | 09:04 to 06:58 | 37.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 01:13 | 03:37 to 02:24 | 21.9% |
| Wall Balls | 01:00 | 06:35 to 05:35 | 18.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:35 | 05:55 to 05:20 | 10.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:21 | 06:37 to 06:16 | 6.3% |
| Rowing | 00:18 | 05:52 to 05:34 | 5.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:17 to 05:17 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:20 to 02:20 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 47:31 to 47:31 | 0.0% |
| Gibson Sarah | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:45 | 00:00 | 05:30 +01:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:17 | 06:45 | 05:19 -00:02 | 05:30 +01:15 |
| Running 2 | 05:37 | 12:02 | 06:00 -00:23 | 10:49 +01:13 |
| Sled Push | 02:20 | 17:39 | 03:04 -00:44 | 16:49 +00:50 |
| Running 3 | 05:46 | 19:59 | 06:20 -00:34 | 19:53 +00:06 |
| Sled Pull | 06:37 | 25:45 | 06:30 +00:07 | 26:13 -00:28 |
| Running 4 | 05:48 | 32:22 | 06:22 -00:34 | 32:43 -00:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:04 | 38:10 | 07:13 +01:51 | 39:05 -00:55 |
| Running 5 | 05:48 | 47:14 | 06:34 -00:46 | 46:18 +00:56 |
| Rowing | 05:52 | 53:02 | 05:37 +00:15 | 52:52 +00:10 |
| Running 6 | 05:53 | 58:54 | 06:27 -00:34 | 58:29 +00:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:37 | 01:04:47 | 02:27 +01:10 | 01:04:56 -00:09 |
| Running 7 | 05:51 | 01:08:24 | 06:24 -00:33 | 01:07:23 +01:01 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:55 | 01:14:15 | 05:29 +00:26 | 01:13:47 +00:28 |
| Running 8 | 06:06 | 01:20:10 | 07:06 -01:00 | 01:19:16 +00:54 |
| Wall Balls | 06:35 | 01:26:16 | 05:43 +00:52 | 01:26:22 -00:06 |
| Roxzone | 07:31 | 01:40:15 | 08:10 -00:39 | 01:40:15 |
Sarah Gibson's performance in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox Race was commendable. She finished in the top 22% of all athletes and top 19% in her age group (35-39). Sarah has a clear inclination towards running, given her total running time was 03:44 faster than the average. She demonstrated her strength in running, particularly in the latter running segments where she consistently outpaced the average time. Sarah's pacing appears to be well executed, as she managed to maintain a strong and consistent performance throughout the race. Her strongest segments were Running 2, Sled Push, Running 3, Running 4, and Running 5, where she outperformed most of her competitors.
In future races, Sarah should aim for a strong start to make up for time in segments where she struggles. Given her strength in running segments, she should use this to her advantage to create a buffer for more challenging segments. Additionally, practicing efficient transitions between exercises can help reduce Roxzone time. Lastly, focusing on maintaining a steady pace rather than short bursts of energy can help improve overall race time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fok Pui Lam | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:40:21 | |
| Gunner Emma | 2023 Malaga | 01:39:52 | |
| Drop Anne | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:40:43 | |
| Chew Zhi Wei | 2023 Singapore | 01:40:08 | |
| Corbett Laura | 2024 Brisbane | 01:39:49 | |
| Staps Theresia | 2021 Berlin | 01:39:54 | |
| Macdonald Hailey | 2024 Melbourne | 01:40:21 | |
| Dunbar Elaina | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:40:21 | |
| Maxwell Jillian | 2023 New York | 01:40:28 | |
| Portes Ornella | 2024 Paris | 01:40:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:55:48 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
