Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gear Andrew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gear Andrew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gear Andrew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gear Andrew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:58 | 06:16 to 04:18 | 40.3% |
| Run Total | 01:31 | 40:13 to 38:42 | 31.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:56 | 05:16 to 04:20 | 19.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:25 | 05:44 to 05:19 | 8.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:03 | 01:54 to 01:51 | 1.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:58 to 03:58 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:14 to 02:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:49 to 03:49 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Gear Andrew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:32 | 00:00 | 04:21 +00:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:58 | 04:32 | 04:20 -00:22 | 04:21 +00:11 |
| Running 2 | 04:23 | 08:30 | 04:41 -00:18 | 08:41 -00:11 |
| Sled Push | 02:14 | 12:53 | 02:41 -00:27 | 13:22 -00:29 |
| Running 3 | 04:46 | 15:07 | 05:04 -00:18 | 16:03 -00:56 |
| Sled Pull | 03:49 | 19:53 | 04:29 -00:40 | 21:07 -01:14 |
| Running 4 | 04:39 | 23:42 | 05:03 -00:24 | 25:36 -01:54 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:16 | 28:21 | 04:46 +00:30 | 30:39 -02:18 |
| Running 5 | 07:03 | 33:37 | 05:11 +01:52 | 35:25 -01:48 |
| Rowing | 04:32 | 40:40 | 04:40 -00:08 | 40:36 +00:04 |
| Running 6 | 04:55 | 45:12 | 05:04 -00:09 | 45:16 -00:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:54 | 50:07 | 02:02 -00:08 | 50:20 -00:13 |
| Running 7 | 04:58 | 52:01 | 05:03 -00:05 | 52:22 -00:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:16 | 56:59 | 04:38 +01:38 | 57:25 -00:26 |
| Running 8 | 04:59 | 01:03:15 | 05:31 -00:32 | 01:02:03 +01:12 |
| Wall Balls | 05:44 | 01:08:14 | 05:51 -00:07 | 01:07:34 +00:40 |
| Roxzone | 05:35 | 01:19:26 | 06:01 -00:26 | 01:19:26 |
Andrew Gear delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, ranking 324th overall, placing him in the top 17% of competitors. Within his age category, he finished 72nd, placing him in the top 19%. His total running time was 00:40:13, which is 00:04 faster than the average, indicating a strong running ability. Andrew's pacing analysis indicates a consistent running performance, with his earlier segments starting slightly slower than average but gaining speed as the race progressed, suggesting effective energy management. His performance profile leans towards a hybrid athlete, with a stronger inclination towards running, as he consistently outperformed the average in running segments, but has room for improvement in certain strength-based exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Staknevicius Rokas | 2024 Gdansk | 01:19:20 | |
| O'Meara Gavin | 2024 Stockholm | 01:19:37 | |
| Verschoor Sébastien | 2024 Marseille | 01:19:04 | |
| Cardoso Anderson | 2023 München | 01:19:02 | |
| Hart Ruairi | 2024 Manchester | 01:19:10 | |
| Köhler Roman | 2023 Wien | 01:19:29 | |
| Blackburn Blaine | 2023 Dallas | 01:18:58 | |
| Schuell Manuel | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:19:44 | |
| Novak Josiah | 2024 New York | 01:19:01 | |
| Wood Spencer | 2023 London | 01:19:08 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
