Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Fox Otis's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Fox Otis's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Fox Otis's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Fox Otis's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:24. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:01 | 08:36 to 05:35 | 47.1% |
| Sled Pull | 01:20 | 05:39 to 04:19 | 20.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:09 | 05:38 to 04:29 | 18.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:29 | 03:00 to 02:31 | 7.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:25 | 02:20 to 01:55 | 6.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:03 to 04:03 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:59 to 03:59 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:18 to 39:18 | 0.0% |
| Fox Otis | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:17 | 00:00 | 04:27 -01:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:03 | 03:17 | 04:23 -00:20 | 04:27 -01:10 |
| Running 2 | 04:21 | 07:20 | 04:46 -00:25 | 08:50 -01:30 |
| Sled Push | 03:00 | 11:41 | 02:46 +00:14 | 13:36 -01:55 |
| Running 3 | 05:14 | 14:41 | 05:10 +00:04 | 16:22 -01:41 |
| Sled Pull | 05:39 | 19:55 | 04:39 +01:00 | 21:32 -01:37 |
| Running 4 | 05:20 | 25:34 | 05:08 +00:12 | 26:11 -00:37 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:59 | 30:54 | 04:57 -00:58 | 31:19 -00:25 |
| Running 5 | 05:21 | 34:53 | 05:17 +00:04 | 36:16 -01:23 |
| Rowing | 04:27 | 40:14 | 04:43 -00:16 | 41:33 -01:19 |
| Running 6 | 05:02 | 44:41 | 05:10 -00:08 | 46:16 -01:35 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:20 | 49:43 | 02:05 +00:15 | 51:26 -01:43 |
| Running 7 | 05:02 | 52:03 | 05:08 -00:06 | 53:31 -01:28 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:38 | 57:05 | 04:49 +00:49 | 58:39 -01:34 |
| Running 8 | 05:44 | 01:02:43 | 05:39 +00:05 | 01:03:28 -00:45 |
| Wall Balls | 08:36 | 01:08:27 | 06:04 +02:32 | 01:09:07 -00:40 |
| Roxzone | 04:34 | 01:21:29 | 06:18 -01:44 | 01:21:29 |
Otis's best running lap was 00:03:17, which was 1 minute faster than the average. This indicates that he excelled in this segment and has good running capabilities. It is worth noting that Otis's total running time was faster than average, suggesting that he has a runner profile and should focus more on strength training to improve his overall fitness.
Additionally, Otis should prioritize efficient transitions between segments to minimize time spent in the roxzone. Improving his overall fitness and working on his transition time will contribute to faster overall race times.
Lastly, Otis should take advantage of his strength in running and continue to train in this area. Incorporating strength training exercises that target his weaker segments will also help improve his overall performance. It is important for Otis to maintain a balanced training routine that focuses on both running and strength training to excel in the Hyrox race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hogarth Michael | 2023 London | 01:21:32 | |
| Lalvay Morocho Ivan | 2023 Barcelona | 01:21:50 | |
| Lazzeri Andrew | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:21:56 | |
| Lajoye Darby | 2019 New York | 01:21:21 | |
| Fourmy Alexandre | 2024 Marseille | 01:21:09 | |
| Seon David | 2024 Bilbao | 01:21:20 | |
| Thompson Chris | 2022 Chicago | 01:21:26 | |
| Nisi Andrea | 2024 Milan | 01:21:52 | |
| Jordan Luke | 2024 Birmingham | 01:21:05 | |
| Witt Moritz | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:21:11 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:11:32 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
